Building refurbishment at Jobcentre Plus Mitre House, Lancaster
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 22 Jun 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought replacement roofs, windows, doors, fascias and rainwater goods, external decoration, and a covered enclosure for ventilation plant.
“This application seeks consent for the installation of replacement roofs, windows, doors, fascias, rainwater goods and other external decoration, new covered enclosure to external ventilation plant.”
“The existing fascias are comprised of timber, and it is proposed to replace these with aluminium. The rainwater goods appear to be comprised of a mix of uPVC and cast iron and it is proposed to replace these with aluminium throughout. The external decoration is comprised of patch repairs to the render, light grey painting and cleansing through a DOFF cleaning system.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site is a city-centre building in a conservation area, near listed buildings and a scheduled monument containing ancient Roman bathhouse remains.
“Mitre House is located on Church Street in the centre of Lancaster. The site forms part of the Castle area and is surrounded by a mix of residential, commercial and municipal buildings.”
“The site is located within the Lancaster Conservation Area and is within the setting of various listed buildings (Grade II listed Three Mariners c.15m to the east, Grade I listed Judges Lodgings c.5m to the south, Grade II listed 97-100 Church Street immediately to the west, Grade II listed Priory c.40m to the west and Grade II listed Round Tower c.15m to the west).”
Officer report
Earlier applications
The report records one earlier tree application involving the felling of trees and other works, which was closed in February 2023.
“Sycamore (G1) - Fell to ground level and remove all arisings (x22 trees) Other Broadleaved Species (T1) - Fell to ground level and remove all arisings Sycamore (T3) - Sever Ivy to 1.5m above ground level reporting all structural defects Lime Species (T10) - Feel to ground level and remove all arisings CLOSED 06/02/2023”
Officer report
Officers’ assessment
Officers considered the proposal acceptable for heritage, biodiversity, trees and neighbouring amenity, subject to conditions and protected-species measures.
“Biodiversity and trees 7.4.1 Policy DM44 states ‘A development proposal will not be permitted where there is an adverse effect on priority species and priority habitat or sites of a local or regional importance for biodiversity and/or geology, unless the benefits of the proposal outweigh the potential adverse effects.’ Where this is not possible, the proposal must ensure that adverse effects are minimised and that provision is made for mitigation and compensation…”
“Conclusion on and biodiversity and trees The proposal, if carried out, will result in the loss of established bat roosts but if the development is carried out in accordance with the compensatory and mitigation measures outlined in the bat report, adverse effects would be avoided and would not be to the detriment of the local bat population or nesting birds by providing suitable alternative nesting and roost provisions.”
Officer report
What consultees and residents said
The Conservation Section, Tree Protection Officer and Historic England raised no objection subject to details, while one objection cited visual and materials concerns.
“Consultee Responses Conservation Section No objection, subject to securing the following conditions/comments: - Submission of details of the proposed aluminium windows and rainwater goods. Tree Protection Officer No objection, subject to securing the following conditions/comments: - Submission of tree protection measures Lancaster Civic Society Support - Supports the maintenance works and would like to see this extended to car park and underpass outside of the site.”
“Historic England No objection subject to securing the following conditions/comments: - Attention of the applicant should be drawn to the requirements to obtain Scheduled Monument Consent should it be necessary to place footings or scaffolding upon the scheduled monument. Regeneration Officer Comments received as follows: - Placement of scaffolding will need careful consideration to avoid impacts on Scheduled Monument.”
Officer report
The committee vote
Councillors proposed approval subject to the report’s conditions, and 15 voted for it with none against or abstaining.
“That the application be approved subject to the conditions in the Committee Report.”
“Upon being put to the vote, 15 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee approved the application subject to conditions covering timing, approved plans, windows and rainwater goods, slate, and protected species mitigation.
“That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:”
“Time limit. 2. Development in accordance with approved plans. 3. Submission of details (windows and RWG). 4. Submission of slate. 5. Protected species mitigation.”
Minutes
Sources
- Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 22 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Lancaster
- Date
- Monday 22 June 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- 15 for, 0 against
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Lancaster committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
59 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.