Crook Farm Slack Lane Thurnham Lancaster Lancashire LA2 0AY Data via plota.co.uk

26/00051/DIS - Submit Details Reserved by Condition Decided

Proposal

Discharge of conditions 4 (rooflights), 5 (windows and doors), 6 (lime render) on approved application Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
26 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
30 Mar 2026
✓
Split Decision
3 Jun 2026

Split Decision on 3 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    Listed buildingApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 5 discharged · 4, 6 decided (outcome not recorded)

Site constraints 10

Grade II listed: Crook Farmhouse
List entry 1317704 · 6 m away · 1 more listed building within 150 m (1 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other one with distances
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Special protection area 9 m away: Morecambe Bay
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
SSSI 9 m away: Cockerham Marsh SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Public bridleway 27 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Also on the record
Nature improvement area: Morecambe Bay Limestones and Wetlands; Priority habitat 15 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present; Flood defence 40 m away (embankment, designed for a 1 in 75 year flood).
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Lancaster - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Lancaster
Application type
Submit Details Reserved by Condition
Postcode
LA2 0AY
Received
26 Mar 2026
Validated
26 Mar 2026
Ward
Ellel Ward
Parish
Thurnham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 May 2026
Decision
Split Decision
Decision date
3 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
ML Planning Consultancy Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14804842
Planning Portal ref
PP-14804842
Consultation
30 Mar 2026
Comments by
28 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
7 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
21 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Lancaster
Planning Authority Score
5/10
Average
#147 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Lancaster is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #84 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Lancaster decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #237 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #231 of 296
74%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #84 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #130 of 296
71%
Minor dwellings approved
45 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
63%
Change of use approved
48 decided
717
Total decisions
122 refused in the year to March 2026