Residential curtilage extension at 8 Waterside, Abergavenny

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Monmouthshire Planning Committee on 7 Jul 2026.

DM/2026/00169Refused

What was proposed

Retrospective permission was sought for residential curtilage, an extended patio and a timber structure sheltering a seating area.

“Retrospective planning permission is sought for a change of use from nil use to residential curtilage and extension of a patio area which also features a timber structure used to shelter a seating area.”

Officer report

The site

The end-of-terrace dwelling is next to the River Gavenny nature site and lies within the development boundary and an archaeologically sensitive area.

“This application relates to an end of terrace dwelling located within the Park Ward of Abergavenny. The site sits adjacent to the River Gavenny Site of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC), a local designation, and is an Archaeologically Sensitive Area. There is a group TPO on the opposite side of the river. The site is within the Development Boundary as identified within the Adopted Local Development Plan.”

Officer report

Earlier works

The patio was laid in 2024 and extends two to three metres onto the riverbank, beyond an earlier patio that did not project as far.

“The application site is located within the settlement boundary as identified by the proposals map of the Monmouthshire Local Development Plan (LDP) and adjoins an existing residential use. A change of use of the land to residential use in association with the dwelling 8 Waterside is typically considered to be acceptable as there is a presumption in favour of development incidental to the enjoyment of a dwelling house.”

“From aerial maps and looking at historic applications, it would appear that the patio has encroached onto the River Gavenny Banks by 2m-3m. The original patio works appear to have taken place more than 10 years ago, but did not encroach onto the banks by the amount we now see today, the patio we see today was laid in 2024 and is of a significant difference in terms of structure and how far it projects compared to the patio that was laid over 10 years ago, and the more recent…”

Officer report

Officers’ recommendation

Officers recommended refusal because the proposal would harm riverbank habitat and did not follow the required approach to protecting and restoring biodiversity.

“The proposal, that forms an incursion into the riverine habitat of the River Gavenny Site of Interest for Nature Conservation, has failed to demonstrate that it complies with the step-wise approach and thus the proposal would fail to comply with section 6.4.15 of Planning Policy Wales (Edition 12, 2024).”

“RECOMMENDATION: REFUSE Reason for Refusal: The proposal, that forms an incursion into the riverine habitat of the River Gavenny Site of Interest for Nature Conservation, has failed to demonstrate that it complies with the step-wise approach and thus the proposal would fail to comply with section 6.4.15 of Planning Policy Wales (Edition 12, 2024), Dear CPO letter (23/10/19) and Policy NE1 of the adopted Monmouthshire Local Development Plan.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The town council recommended approval, biodiversity and drainage consultees objected, other named consultees raised no objection, and neighbours made no comments.

“Abergavenny Town Council: Recommend Approval. MCC SAB: Objects to the proposal. MCC Biodiversity: Objects to the proposal. The Section 6 Duty of the Environment (Wales) Act 2016 requires planning decisions to result in maintained and enhanced ecological networks. The unauthorised work has a potentially adverse impact on a locally designated site, contrary to LDP Policy NE1.”

“A site notice was placed within the public realm and neighbours were consulted via letter. No comments have been provided during the consultation period.”

Officer report

Environmental harm

The works removed riverbank vegetation, affected a protected ecological site and left an unstable structure that could send sediment into the river.

“The Biodiversity Officer has offered an in-depth response to the consultation. 'The proposal is a retrospective application for an extension of a patio area and a wooden shed built on the patio. The unauthorised works have extended 2-3 metres from the development line, directly impacting the River Gavenny, a Site of Interest for Nature Conservation (SINC) designated as a watercourse supporting otters, white clawed crayfish and priority fish and bird species.”

“The Biodiversity Officer explains the impact the proposal will have on the SINC, 'The unauthorised works have resulted in the removal of riparian vegetation along the riverbank, leading to the direct loss of habitat that is important for screening and shading the river corridor. Screening is important to minimise disturbance from the residential development on wildlife using the river corridor.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillors proposed and seconded refusal, which passed with 12 votes for, three against and no abstentions.

“In noting the detail of the application and the views expressed, it was proposed by County Councillor Emma Bryn and seconded by County Councillor John Crook that application DM/2026/00169 be refused for the reason outlined in the report.”

“For refusal - 12 Against refusal - 3 Abstentions - 0”

Minutes

Sources

  • Monmouthshire Planning Committee minutes, 7 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Monmouthshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 7 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

28 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →