Land Adjacent To Friths Court Gregson Lane Brindle Data via plota.co.uk

26/00061/PIP - Permission In Principle Approved

Proposal

Permission in principle application for the erection of up to seven dwellings and associated infrastructure Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
22 Jan 2026
✓
Committee
10 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
11 Mar 2026

Approved on 11 Mar 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Chorley Planning Committee on 10 Mar 2026.

Approved by 8 votes to 1

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised granting permission in principle because the location, land use and amount of development were acceptable at this stage.
  • The committee granted permission in principle by 8 votes to 1, with 1 abstention, after a site-visit deferral was proposed.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers, committee debate, vote and decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of Chorley's committee minutes of 10 Mar 2026.

Documents 74

Consultation & comments 66

PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 17 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 17 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF LAND ADJAENT FRITHS COURT - 15-02-2026 BRINDLE PC Consultee Response · 16 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 16 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 15 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 12 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 8 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 7 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 6 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF U Consultee Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF INITIAL NEIGHBOUR LETTER14 DAYS Correspondence · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Also on the record
Green belt about 11 m away: Merseyside and Greater Manchester.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chorley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chorley
Application type
Permission In Principle
Postcode
PR5 0EF
Received
21 Jan 2026
Validated
22 Jan 2026
Ward
Clayton East, Brindle And Hoghton
Parish
Brindle
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Feb 2026
Decision
Permission in Principle Approved
Decision date
11 Mar 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
De Pol Associates Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 48 days from validation, 13 days faster than Chorley's median of 61 for new homes. Approved, as 81% of new homes here are.

44%decided within 8 weeks
81%approved
68decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Chorley in the last twelve months, from validation. Chorley decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
17 Feb 2026
Committee
10 Mar 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chorley
Planning Authority Score
7.5/10
Good
#42 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chorley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #49 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chorley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #51 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #73 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #49 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #100 of 296
95%
Minor dwellings approved
77 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
4 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
11 decided
553
Total decisions
39 refused in the year to March 2026