Land Adjcent Rossendale Drive Adlington PR6 9AB Data via plota.co.uk

26/00170/DIS - Discharge of Condition(s) Refused

Proposal

Application to discharge conditions 7 (Ground Levels), 11 (Employment and Skills Plan), 12 (Remediation Strategy), 13 (Arboricultural Method Statement and Tree Protection Plan), 15 (Construction Surface Water Management Plan), 18 (Construction Traffic Management Method Statement), 19 (Road Management and Maintenance), 22 (CEMP), 24 (Landscape and Ecological Management Plan), 27 (CEMP - Biodiversity), 28 (Works Adjacent to a Railway Risk Assessment and Method Statement), 30 (Vibro Works Risk Assessment and Method Statement), 31 (Drainage Strategy), 32 (Ground Levels, Earthworks and Excavations Adjacent Railway) and 33 (Vehicle Safety Protection Measures Adjacent Railway) attached to planning permission (Erection of 137no. dwellings, of which 30% will be affordable, together with associated roads, car parking and landscaping works) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Feb 2026
✗
Refused
17 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 17 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 24 Jul 2026

Documents 58

Plans & drawings 20

PDF CEMP Amended Plans · 25 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSTRUCTION & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN REV 2 Amended Plans · 23 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF SECTION 38 TECHNICAL ACCEPTANCE Report · 9 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSTRUCTION ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (CEMP) VERSION 2 Amended Plans · 28 May 2026 View ↗ PDF LANDSCAPE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (LEMP) VERSION 2 Amended Plans · 28 May 2026 View ↗ PDF APPENDIX 3 MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING SCHEDULE Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 24 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN REV 2 Amended Plans · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF RAIL MANAGEMENT PLAN Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 6 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SIGNED BAPA Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 6 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SECTION - PROPOSED_INCLUDED_IN_SECTION - EXISTING_34824792 Planning Application (inc initial correspondence) · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF SECTION - PROPOSED_INCLUDED_IN_SECTION - EXISTING Planning Application (inc initial correspondence) · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF RAIL MANAGEMENT PLAN ADDLINGTON R2 Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED TYPICAL RETAINING WALL DETAILS Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED TYPICAL RETAINING WALL DETAILS 5KN Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF SECTIONS THROUGH RAILWAY EMBANKMENT - P01. Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EXTERNAL WORKS SHEET 1 OF 2 Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED EXTERNAL WORKS SHEET 2 OF 2 Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF S38 LAYOUT Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF S104 LAYOUT SHEET 1 OF 2 Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF S104 LAYOUT SHEET 2 OF 2 Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 8

Site constraints 4

Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chorley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Chorley
Application type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Postcode
PR6 9AB
Received
20 Feb 2026
Validated
20 Feb 2026
Ward
Adlington And Anderton
Parish
Adlington
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Apr 2026
Decision
Condition(s) not discharged
Decision date
17 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14690952
Planning Portal ref
PP-14690952
Comments by
18 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
17 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
Chorley
Planning Authority Score
7.5/10
Good
#42 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Chorley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #49 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Chorley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #51 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #73 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #49 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #100 of 296
95%
Minor dwellings approved
77 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
4 decided (10+ homes)
73%
Change of use approved
11 decided
553
Total decisions
39 refused in the year to March 2026