One house and four flats at The Woodlands, Wollaston, Stourbridge
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Dudley Planning Committee on 2 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The proposal would convert a vacant care home into one house and four apartments, with alterations, parking, gardens and demolition of the link corridor.
“The application proposes the conversion of the existing vacant care home (C2) into a single dwellinghouse and four apartments (C3). The development would include internal and external alterations and associated works including reallocation of garden spaces, parking provision and the demolition of the existing link corridor.”
“It is indicated in the Design and Access Statement that the proposed dwelling types and size has been based on the need identified by the Dudley MBC Housing Strategy Team. The proposed development, following the demolition of an existing link corridor, would result in two detached buildings with associated gardens and parking provision separated by…”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The site contains two connected care-home buildings, parking, gardens, trees and boundary planting beside homes and near a conservation area.
“The application site comprises the Woodlands care home. This is a vacant care home that appears as two sperate buildings but are connected by a single storey link corridor. The properties consist of 17 bedrooms with associated ancillary accommodation. The building to the north is a two storey building with a pitched roof with a hipped feature and section of flat roof to the rear.”
“The application site adjoins the boundary with No. 64b Bridle Road on the southern boundary which forms a two storey new build detached dwelling. To the north of the site is the side boundary of No. Meriden Avenue. This is a detached two storey dwelling with a pitched roof and render finish. To the east of the site is the side elevation of No. Meriden Avenue and its rear garden that runs parallel to the application site.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval, considering the proposal sustainable and acceptable for housing, design, amenity, highways, ecology, trees, drainage and heritage.
“The proposal has been assessed against all relevant material planning considerations and is considered acceptable in respect of design, character and appearance, heritage impacts, residential amenity, highway safety, parking, ecology, biodiversity, arboriculture and drainage. Subject to the recommended conditions, the development would provide an acceptable standard of accommodation for future occupiers without causing unacceptable harm to neighbouring amenity.”
Officer report
What consultees said
Council officers generally supported the scheme subject to conditions, while highways found no major concerns warranting refusal.
“Historic Environment Officer: No objection and recommends approval subject to a condition for landscaping.”
“Highways Officer (AMEY): Number of parking spaces is in accordance with the requirements of the Parking Standards SPD. Tracking has been provided to demonstrate adequate manoeuvrability within the site. No major highway concerns to warrant a refusal. Makes recommendations for the relocation of cycle parking.”
Officer report
What people said
Objections raised concerns about parking, highway safety, amenity, heritage, trees, ecology, crime and losing the care facility, while five addresses supported the scheme.
“Three letters of objection were received from Councillor Tromans. Concerns raised include impact on Conservation Area, impact on neighbouring amenity and fear of crime, no Electrical Vehicle Charging, future occupier amenity, impact on protected species, lack of parking. Councillor Tromans also states that he supports the increased provision of more social homes in the borough and requests that the development is designated for over 50’s housing. Matters…”
“A joint letter of objection was received from Councillor MacLeod and Southall. Objections are raised in regard to the loss of a care facility, highways safety, overdevelopment of the site including occupier amenity standards, impact on trees and biodiversity, impact on neighbouring occupiers amenity and drainage.”
Officer report
Members’ concerns
Members discussed concerns about parking and highway safety after visiting the site; one member did not take part because he had missed the visit.
“Consideration was given to the following planning application in respect of which Members of the Committee had undertaken a site visit earlier that day.”
“Members raised concerns regarding parking and highway safety and following further discussion, having regard to the concerns raised, both the decision and the reasons for that decision were put to the vote and it was moved and seconded and following a vote it was:”
Minutes
The vote
The committee voted to refuse the application contrary to the officer recommendation.
“That the application be refused contrary to Officer recommendation for the reason set out below: -”
Minutes
The decision and reason
The application was refused because the committee found inadequate parking and layout would create an unacceptable impact on highway safety.
“The proposed development would fail to provide adequate parking provision and parking layout to adequately serve the proposed development, resulting in an unacceptable impact on highway safety. The proposed development would therefore fail to comply with TR6 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2026), policy DLP14 and DLP65 of the Dudley Local Plan (2026).”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
“For the reason set out below: - PC/9 The proposed development would fail to provide adequate parking provision and parking layout to adequately serve the proposed development, resulting in an unacceptable impact on highway safety. The proposed development would therefore fail to comply with TR6 of the National Planning Policy Framework (2026), policy DLP14 and DLP65 of the Dudley Local Plan (2026).”
Minutes
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Sources
- Dudley Planning Committee minutes, 2 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Dudley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Dudley Planning Committee
- Council
- Dudley
- Date
- Wednesday 2 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Dudley committee decisions →
This committee's year
9 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.