Short-term let accommodation at 38 Springfield, Edinburgh

“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 01/07/2025.”

“The application property is a mid-terrace dwellinghouse. The property comprises two bedrooms, bathroom, kitchen, and a combined dining/living room. The approximate floor area of the property is 52.1 square metres.”

“The immediate surrounding area is a mix of low and high density residential. There are some mixed uses within the wider area, including Leith Walk which is located to the south east of the property. Public transport links are in close proximity to the property.”

“Relevant Site History No relevant site history.”

“The change of use of the property to a short-term let (STL) will have an unacceptable impact on neighbouring amenity. The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the City as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on residential amenity or the loss of residential accommodation.”

“Overall, the proposal does not comply with Development Plan LDP Policy Hou 6 and NPF4 policy 30(e). There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”

“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”

“Given the declared housing emergency and pressures on residential accommodation in Edinburgh, in addition to the economic and societal benefits that residential accommodation in the City brings in terms of people being able to live, work and contribute to their community, significant weight has to be given to the retention of existing residential accommodation.”

“A total of five representations have been received, a petition in support with 21 signatories, and four objection comments, including one from Leith Central Community Council. The petition was submitted by the agent who is the lead petition coordinator. A summary of the representations is below.”

“- Impact on local community mix, character, and security. - Increased noise and disturbance. - Traffic safety concerns. - Concern for retrospective status.”

“25/06681/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”