Land At Junction Of A606 Widmerpool And Fosse Way Hickling Pastures Nottinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/00108/ADV - Advert Application Refused

Proposal

Display of 20m high internally illuminated Totem Sign Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
20 Jan 2026
Validated
21 Jan 2026
Refused
24 Mar 2026
Consultation
25 Mar 2026
Appeal dismissed
23 Jun 2026

Refused on 24 Mar 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 25 Jul 2026

Site constraints 1

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Advert Application
Received
20 Jan 2026
Validated
21 Jan 2026
Ward
Nevile And Langar
Parish
Hickling
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 Mar 2026
Decision
Refuse permission with reasons
Decision date
24 Mar 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Appeal
Dismissed · 23 Jun 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case ↗
Applicant
Show
Agent
Montagu Evans

How this decision compares

Decided in 62 days from validation, 8 days slower than Rushcliffe's median of 54 for advertisement consent. Refused, as 13% of advertisement consent here are.

70%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
5,732decided in the last year

Plota live figures for advertisement consent decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent advertisement consent in Rushcliffe to go on. Rushcliffe decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
25 Mar 2026
Consultation
25 Mar 2026
Comments by
17 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
10 Feb 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026