Car Parks At Rivington Lane And Belmont Road Rivington Data via plota.co.uk

26/00668/FUL - Full Planning Withdrawn

Proposal

Installation of 4no. payment machines and 8no. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) Cameras in order to facilitate the provision of a car park management system Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 8 Oct 2026, 01:24

Street View

Application progress

✓

Received

29 Jul 2026

−

Withdrawn

1 Sept 2026

Withdrawn on 1 Sept 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 7 Sept 2026

Documents 38

Decision & officer reports 1

PDF WITHDRAWN FULL PLANNING APPLICATION Decision · 1 Sept 2026 View ↗

Statements & assessments 9

Plans & drawings 9

PDF IMPROVEMENT PLAN PRINCIPLES Report · 21 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN: KNOWLE HOUSE CAR PARK Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN: GREAT HOUSE BARN CAR PARK Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN: MAIN DRIVE Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN: REAR DRIVE Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN: RIVINGTON SCHOOL Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED SITE PLAN: LOWER HOUSE CAR PARK Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Site Elevations, Building Plans etc. · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF LOCATION PLAN Site Location Plan · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗

Application forms 1

PDF APPLICATION FORM Planning Application (inc initial correspondence) · 29 Jul 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 15

Site constraints 9

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester

Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.

Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.

Read the government guidance ↗

Registered park or garden: Lever Park

Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.

Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.

Historic England ↗

In flood zones plus climate change

Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.

The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.

Flood map ↗

Habitat network: Other Priority Habitats - NEZ

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

SSSI 253 m away: West Pennine Moors SSSI; Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat 10 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Chorley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

4 Sept 2026Pending

Rosewood Lever Park Avenue Bolton BL6 7LQ

PRUNING OF 1NO. OAK TREE

01612/26

24 Aug 2026Pending

Rivington And Blackrod High School Rivington Lane Rivington Bolton BL6 7RU

Installation of 8no. ground mounted air source heat pumps.

26/00746/FUL

29 Jul 2026Withdrawn

Car Park Opposite Knowle House Rivington Lane Rivington

Extension and reconfiguration of existing car park including landscaping, draina...

26/00665/FUL

Important details

Council: Chorley
Application type: Full Planning
Received: 29 Jul 2026
Validated: 29 Jul 2026
Ward: Adlington And Anderton
Parish: Rivington
Case officer: Show
Target decision: 23 Sept 2026
Decision: Application Withdrawn
Decision date: 1 Sept 2026
Decision level: Delegated Decision
Applicant: Show
Agent: The Environment Partnership

Public comments

218comments received

216 objecting2 supporting

99% object · above the UK average of 74%

28 neighbours consulted · Last counted 7 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference: PP-15103720
Planning Portal ref: PP-15103720
Comments by: 17 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry: 23 Sept 2026
Env. assessment: No

Chorley

Planning Authority Score

7.5/10

Good

#42 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

Chorley is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #49 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils

for householder decisions

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

Chorley decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

93%

Overall approval rate

Above avg (87%) #51 of 296

95%

Householder approved

Above avg (90%) #73 of 296

78%

Decided in 8 weeks

Above avg (63%) #49 of 296

35%

Extended time limit

Below avg (41%) #100 of 296

95%

Minor dwellings approved

77 decided (1-9 homes)

100%

Major dwellings approved

4 decided (10+ homes)

73%

Change of use approved

11 decided

553

Total decisions

39 refused in the year to March 2026