Land North Of Thetford Road Fakenham Magna Suffolk Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/0021/FUL - Full Planning Application Refused

Proposal

Planning application - one dwelling and associated access Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
5 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
7 May 2026
✗
Refused
5 Jun 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 5 Jun 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 7 Jul 2026

Documents 42

Consultation & comments 19

PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER (PSH & EH) - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 27 May 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSERVATION OFFICER - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 22 May 2026 View ↗
IMG Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗
IMG Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF SUFFOLK FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SPRINKLER LETTER SUFFOLK FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 15 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF PARISH COUNCIL - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 13 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH OFFICER (PSH & EH) - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 2 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF PLACE SERVICES LANDSCAPE - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 2 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Neighbour Response · 24 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF HIGHWAYS - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENT TEAM - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF PLACE SERVICES TREES - COMMENTS Consultation Response · 11 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Fakenham Magna conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Hill House, Grade II, about 47 m from the postcode pin · 4 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 4 with distances
Historic England ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in West Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
IP24 2QY
Received
7 Jan 2026
Validated
5 Feb 2026
Ward
Bardwell
Parish
Fakenham Magna
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Apr 2026
Decision
Refuse application
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
John Long Planning

How this decision compares

Decided in 120 days from validation, 48 days slower than West Suffolk's median of 72 for new homes. Refused, as 23% of new homes here are.

34%decided within 8 weeks
77%approved
66decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by West Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. West Suffolk decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14600742
Planning Portal ref
PP-14600742
Consultation
7 May 2026
Comments by
29 May 2026
Site or press notice
19 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Apr 2026
Env. assessment
No
West Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
4.3/10
Below average
#186 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

West Suffolk is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #208 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
West Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #104 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #95 of 296
56%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #208 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #204 of 296
64%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
51 decided
1,018
Total decisions
91 refused in the year to March 2026