14 Prospect Row Bury St Edmunds Suffolk IP33 3DG Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/0228/ADV - Adverts - Application to Display Refused

Proposal

Application for advertisement consent - 35 projecting signs Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
25 Feb 2026
✓
Consultation
25 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
3 Jun 2026
✗
Refused
5 Jun 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 5 Jun 2026 · Committee · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by West Suffolk Development Control Committee on 3 Jun 2026.

Refused unanimously

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the signs were modest, safe and respectful of the Arc’s character.
  • The town council, a ward councillor and local representations opposed the signs as poorly designed, unnecessary and visually cluttering.
  • Members unanimously refused the application because it breached Policy LP9 and created visual clutter conflicting with the Arc’s original design.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officers’ assessment, objections, committee debate, vote and refusal reasons.

Source: Plota analysis of West Suffolk's committee minutes of 3 Jun 2026.

Site constraints 2

3 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 2, Kings Road, Grade II, about 46 m from the postcode pin · 3 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 3 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Bury St Edmunds built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in West Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Adverts - Application to Display
Postcode
IP33 3DG
Received
11 Feb 2026
Validated
25 Feb 2026
Ward
Abbeygate
Parish
Bury St Edmunds Town Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
22 Apr 2026
Decision
Refuse application
Decision date
5 Jun 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Hudson Sign Solutions Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 100 days from validation, 38 days slower than West Suffolk's median of 62 for signs and adverts. Refused, as 7% of signs and adverts here are.

37%decided within 8 weeks
93%approved
29decided in the last year

Plota live figures for signs and adverts decided by West Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. West Suffolk decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14696165
Consultation
25 Feb 2026
Comments by
23 Mar 2026
Site or press notice
25 Feb 2026
Committee
3 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
West Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
4.3/10
Below average
#186 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

West Suffolk is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #208 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
West Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #104 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #95 of 296
56%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #208 of 296
46%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #204 of 296
64%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
10 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
51 decided
1,018
Total decisions
91 refused in the year to March 2026