The Old House Gamston Wood Upton Nottinghamshire DN22 0RB Data via plota.co.uk

26/00259/VOC - Variation of Condition Approved

Proposal

Variation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) 3 (Facing and Roofing Materials) & 4 (Bat and Bird Boxes)of P.A. Convert Existing Building to Create One Dwelling Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
9 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
17 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
25 Jun 2026

Approved on 25 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 2 varied

    • VariationVariation of Condition 2 (Approved Plans) 3 (Facing and Roofing Materials) & 4 (Bat and Bird…This application26/00259/VOC

Site constraints 5

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI about 274 m away: Gamston & Eaton Woods & Roadside Verges SSSI; Coalfield, development low risk area; Priority habitat about 41 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Bassetlaw - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Bassetlaw
Application type
Variation of Condition
Postcode
DN22 0RB
Received
6 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Mar 2026
Ward
East Markham
Parish
Askham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 May 2026
Decision
Grant
Decision date
25 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
UKSD Developments

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14757602
Planning Portal ref
PP-14757602
Neighbours
18 Mar 2026
Consultation
17 Mar 2026
Comments by
9 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
19 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
4 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Bassetlaw
Planning Authority Score
1.2/10
Poor
#286 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Bassetlaw is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #291 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 73% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (89%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Bassetlaw decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #203 of 296
89%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #199 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #291 of 296
73%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #289 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
77 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
78%
Change of use approved
45 decided
575
Total decisions
87 refused in the year to March 2026