Virgina Woolf College Giles Lane Canterbury Kent CT2 7BQ Data via plota.co.uk

CA/26/01111 - Cert of proposed lawful use or devt Approved

Proposal

Application for lawful development certificate for proposed external wall remediation and fire safety upgrade works to existing student accommodation. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
30 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
24 Jul 2026

Approved on 24 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 28 Jul 2026

Site constraints 10

Nutrient neutrality catchment: Stodmarsh SAC/SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Article 4 direction
Canterbury and surrounding area. Dated 25.02.2015 effective 25.02.2016. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 1320 m away: Richborough Connection Project; Scheduled monument about 188 m away: Part of the Tyler Hill medieval pottery and tile industry; Conservation area about 50 m away: the Tyler Hill Conservation Area. Registered 27.03.1995; 2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the Canterbury built-up area; Priority habitat about 31 m away: Deciduous woodland; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Canterbury - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Canterbury
Application type
Cert of proposed lawful use or devt
Postcode
CT2 7BQ
Received
30 Jun 2026
Validated
30 Jun 2026
Ward
Blean Forest
Case officer
Show
Target decision
25 Aug 2026
Decision
Would be lawful
Decision date
24 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Ellis Williams Architects

How this decision compares

Decided in 24 days from validation, 31 days faster than Canterbury's median of 55 for extensions. Approved, as 98% of extensions here are.

73%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
372decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Canterbury in the last twelve months, from validation. Canterbury decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
25 Aug 2026
Canterbury
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#158 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Canterbury is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #259 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Canterbury decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #18 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #27 of 296
43%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #259 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #176 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
29 decided
925
Total decisions
45 refused in the year to March 2026