Land At Broadhurst Lane, Congleton Data via plota.co.uk

24/4574/FUL - Full Planning Refused

Proposal

Residential development of 22 dwellings including highway improvements at the Broadhurst Lane Junction with the Clayton Bypass, estate roads, car parking, boundary treatments, landscaping, open space and other associated works and ancillary development. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Nov 2024
✓
Validated
6 Jan 2025
✓
Committee
1 Apr 2026
✗
Refused
1 Apr 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 1 Apr 2026 · Southern Planning Committee · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Cheshire East Southern Planning Committee on 1 Apr 2026.

Refused

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised refusal because drainage, housing tenure, access and ecological information were inadequate.
  • The council, residents and supporters raised concerns or support about highways, flooding, wildlife, infrastructure and affordable housing.
  • The committee refused the application, adding harm to Dane Mill’s setting as a reason.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ concerns, public views, speakers, committee decision and refusal reasons.

Source: Plota analysis of Cheshire East's committee minutes of 1 Apr 2026.

Documents 82

Statements & assessments 34

PDF Preliminary Drainage Layout Submitted Plans · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Affordable Housing Statement Supporting Information · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Heritage Consultee Response · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology Consultee Response · 2 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF Heritage Consultee Response · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Tree survey Supporting Information · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Transport note Supporting Information · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF BNG Matrix calcs Supporting Information · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Drainage layout Revised Plans · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Drainage model 3o years Supporting Information · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Drainage model 100 years Supporting Information · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF BNG metric Supporting Information · 23 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF Ecology Consultee Response · 2 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG MATRIX Supporting Information · 27 Mar 2025 View ↗ PDF Odour Assessment Supporting Information · 18 Feb 2025 View ↗ PDF Planning Statement Supporting Information · 20 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Affordable Housing Statement Supporting Information · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Design and access statement Supporting Information · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Transport assessment Supporting Information · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Air quality assessment Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Statutory Biodiversity Metric Report Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Noise impact assessment Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Land contamination assessment pt2 Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Land contamination assessment pt1 Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Land contamination assessment pt2 Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Land contamination assessment pt1 Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Land contamination assessment plans Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Phase I Geoenvironmental Site Assessment pt1 Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Arboricultural Impact Assessment Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Topographical Survey Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Flood risk assessment Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗ PDF Energy Statement Submitted Plans · 12 Nov 2024 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Habitat network: Restorable Habitat
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Congleton built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 18 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Cheshire East - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning
Received
11 Nov 2024
Validated
6 Jan 2025
Ward
Congleton West
Parish
Congleton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Apr 2026
Decision
Refused
Decision date
1 Apr 2026
Decision level
Southern Planning Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Lichfields

How this decision compares

Decided in 450 days from validation, 292 days slower than Cheshire East's median of 158 for new homes. Refused, as 33% of new homes here are.

17%decided within 8 weeks
67%approved
15%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Cheshire East in the last twelve months, from validation. Cheshire East decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
12 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Apr 2026
Cheshire East
Planning Authority Score
1.9/10
Poor
#274 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Cheshire East is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #268 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 65% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Cheshire East decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #168 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #170 of 296
39%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #268 of 296
65%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #279 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
358 decided (1-9 homes)
76%
Major dwellings approved
25 decided (10+ homes)
79%
Change of use approved
119 decided
2,513
Total decisions
321 refused in the year to March 2026