Land East Of Honington Road Barkston NG32 2NE Data via plota.co.uk

S26/0248 - Full Planning Permission (Major) Awaiting decision

Proposal

Residential development (69no. dwellings) including area of open space, infrastructure and landscaping Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
11 Feb 2026
Decision
Expected by 12 May 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 9 Oct 2026; it is now day 240.

The consultation period closed on 18 Apr 2026.

Documents 111

Consultation & comments 79

PDF HIGHWAYS / SUDS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PARISH COUNCILL COMMENTS REDACTED Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SPORT ENGLAND COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF CONSERVATION OFFICER COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 2 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF ANGLIAN WATER COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 31 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF HISTORIC ENGLAND COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF BARKSTON AND SYSTON PARISH COUNCIL REDACTED Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 24 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF LINCOLNSHIRE WILDLIFE TRUST Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 23 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 20 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 19 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF BARKSTON & SYSTON CRICKET CLUB COMMENTS REDACTED Consultee Comment - SENSITIVE · 16 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 13 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 13 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 13 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 11 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representation - Sensitive · 11 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF ENVIRONMENTAL PRTECTION COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF LINCS FIRE & RESCUE COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF NHS LINCOLNSHIRE COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 9 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF LINCS COUNTY COUNCIL EDUCATION COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENT AGENCY COMMENTS Consultee Comment - PUBLIC · 4 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m; Priority habitat 6 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present; Inside the Barkston built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Kesteven - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Permission (Major)
Postcode
NG32 2NE
Received
11 Feb 2026
Validated
11 Feb 2026
Ward
Peascliffe And Ridgeway Ward
Parish
Barkston Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 May 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
STAT Planning

Decision outlook

Day 240, past the statutory target. 59% of new homes in South Kesteven are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 1 Oct 2026.

Day 240149 days past the 91-day target
19%decided within 8 weeks
65%approved
8%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by South Kesteven in the last twelve months, from validation. South Kesteven decision record →

Public comments

98comments received
95 objecting2 neutral1 supporting

97% object · above the UK average of 74%

32 neighbours consulted · Last counted 24 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14690772
Planning Portal ref
PP-14690772
Comments by
18 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
12 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Kesteven
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#244 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

South Kesteven is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #262 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Kesteven decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
91%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #100 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #118 of 296
43%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #262 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #270 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
110 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
55 decided
1,002
Total decisions
95 refused in the year to March 2026