Children’s care home at 11 Hydes Road, Wednesbury
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Sandwell Planning Committee on 29 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a two-bedroom house into a care home for up to two children aged 5 to 19, without extensions or external alterations.
“DC/26/71478 Application Description Change of use from a single dwelling-house (Use Class C3) to a children’s residential care home for children aged 5 to 19 years (Use Class C2) Application Received 20.02.2026 Application Address 11 Hydes Road Wednesbury WS10 9SX Report Author…”
“The Application Site 5.1 The application property is a two-bedroom terraced property located on the northern side of Hydes Road, Great Barr within a residential area, site surrounding is predominantly residential in nature characterised by a variety of house types. Planning History There is no planning history for this application site.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a terraced house in a mainly residential area, with no off-road parking but on-street parking and a nearby public car park.
“As the property is terraced in nature there is no provision for off-road parking. However, on-street parking is available within the surrounding residential streets. In addition, a public car park is located within a short walking distance of the property which can be used by staff or visitors if required.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
Officers considered the use compatible with the residential area and found no significant harm to living conditions, traffic, noise or highway safety.
“National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 9.1 The NPPF sets out government's planning policies for England and how these are expected to be applied. Highway safety 9.2 The framework promotes sustainable transport options for development proposal and states that developments should only be prevented or refused on highway grounds if there would be an unacceptable impact on highway safety, or the residual cumulative impacts on the road network would be severe.”
“I have noted concerns that the proposed development would be an inappropriate use and out of character with the residential area. However, the proposed use falls into a residential use in the Use Classes Order 1987 (as amended). It does not fall into a commercial, business or service use. As such, the proposed use would be compatible with a residential area and this location.”
Officer report
Consultees’ views
Highways and noise officers raised no objections subject to measures, while police supported the proposal and recommended CCTV, lighting and security.
“The Head of Highways has no objections following the receipt of additional information. Staff will be encouraged to use sustainable modes of transport wherever possible as the property is located within an established residential area with access to local amenities and public transport. Furthermore, staff will be encouraged to walk, cycle or use public transport, and secure cycle storage can be provided at the property.”
“They recommend that a plan is provided to include CCTV, lighting and security if permission is granted.”
Officer report
Who spoke
The applicant said the proposal would be professionally managed with staffing and safeguarding, while an objector raised concerns about management, noise and shared access.
Members’ discussion
The applicant said traffic would match a standard household, and highways officers said parking was sufficient and the road network would not be severely affected.
“Following questions from members, it was clarified by the applicant that the traffic to and from the property would be no different from a standard household. Furthermore, Officers from Highways confirmed that sufficient parking was available at the property and that the highway network would not be severely impacted.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
The voting councillors agreed to defer the application so they could visit the site.
“Members thought that a site visit would be useful to better understand the application and, as such, were in agreement to defer the application in order to undertake a site visit.”
“Resolved that Planning Application DC/26/71478 - 11 Hydes Road, Wednesbury WS10 9SX (Change of use from a single dwelling-house (Use Class C3) to a children’s residential care home for children aged 5 to 19 years (Use Class C2)) is deferred for a site visit.”
Minutes
Sources
- Sandwell Planning Committee minutes, 29 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Sandwell's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Sandwell Planning Committee
- Council
- Sandwell
- Date
- Wednesday 29 July 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Sandwell committee decisions →
This committee's year
45 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.