Gisborough Hall Whitby Lane Guisborough TS13 6PT Data via plota.co.uk

R/2026/0555/TR - Tree in TPO Area Approved

Proposal

Crown lifting lime trees (T1 - T6) to max 4.2m (TPO ) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Validated
6 Aug 2026
Received
9 Aug 2026
Approved
9 Sept 2026

Approved on 9 Sept 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 13 Sept 2026

Site constraints 3

Guisborough conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Heritage at risk: Guisborough
On the register of historic places assessed as at risk.
A designated building, monument, park or conservation area assessed as at risk from neglect, decay or development. Proposals that secure its future are looked on favourably.
Historic England ↗
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Tree in TPO Area
Postcode
TS13 6PT
Received
9 Aug 2026
Validated
6 Aug 2026
Parish
Guisborough CP
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANT CONSENT FOR TREE WORKS
Decision date
9 Sept 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 34 days from validation, 10 days slower than Redcar and Cleveland's median of 24 for tree works. Approved, as 100% of tree works here are.

100%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
20decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree works decided by Redcar and Cleveland in the last twelve months, from validation. Redcar and Cleveland decision record →

Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026