Kingsgate Bridge New Elvet Durham DH1 1XF Data via plota.co.uk

DM/25/03239/LB - Listed Building Consent Approved

Proposal

A range of cores and holes bored/drilled from the concrete structure to test for: material composition; moisture content; carbonation depth; chloride concentration; concrete strength; asbestos content; likelihood of active corrosion in reinforcement; potential for future corrosion in reinforcement. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
18 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
19 Nov 2025
✓
Consultation
26 Nov 2025
✓
Approved
14 Jan 2026

Approved on 14 Jan 2026 · Fast Track · Last checked 7 Oct 2026

Site constraints 11

Grade I listed: Kingsgate Bridge
List entry 1119766 · 2 m away · 34 more listed buildings within 150 m (4 Grade I, 30 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other 34 with distances
Historic England ↗
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Durham City conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Public footpath 22 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; World heritage site 148 m away: Durham Castle and Cathedral; Flood defence 16 m away (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 2 year flood); Inside the Durham built-up area; Priority habitat 15 m away: Deciduous woodland; Air quality management area 86 m away: Durham County Council Air Quality Management Area.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 7 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Listed Building Consent
Postcode
DH1 1XF
Received
18 Nov 2025
Validated
19 Nov 2025
Ward
Elvet, Gilesgate And Shincliffe
Parish
City Of Durham
Case officer
Show
Target decision
14 Jan 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
14 Jan 2026
Decision level
Fast Track
Applicant
Show
Agent
Arup

How this decision compares

Decided in 56 days from validation, about the council's usual 54 days. Approved, as 98% of listed building works here are.

75%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
98decided in the last year

Plota live figures for listed building works decided by Durham in the last twelve months, from validation. Durham decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

1 neighbour consulted · Last counted 7 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14473633
Planning Portal ref
PP-14473633
Neighbours
24 Nov 2025
Consultation
26 Nov 2025
Comments by
25 Dec 2025
Site or press notice
24 Nov 2025
Statutory expiry
14 Jan 2026
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026