Two semi-detached homes at 1 Littleworth Lane, Partridge Green

“The application seeks permission for the demolition of the existing dwelling and 2no outbuildings and the erection of 2 semi-detached dwellings and car ports to the rear of the site. Vehicular access would be provided via the existing access point on Littleworth Lane with pedestrian access gained via a new path which utilises an existing gap in the hedgerow. Amenity space would be provided to the rear of each dwelling.”

“The application site currently consists of one detached chalet bungalow (1.5 storeys) situated on the western side of Littleworth Lane. The dwelling comprises stock brick facing to all elevations, with a clay tiled roof, front and rear facing open gables and side facing box dormers. Two outbuildings are located within the red line boundary of this application.”

“Policy S5(4) does however, go on to allow for circumstance were development proposals which do not fall within the categories of development that should be approved outside of settlements, could be approved; in circumstance where the benefits of the proposal would substantially outweigh the adverse effects including to the character of the countryside.”

“The proposal would also contribute, albeit minimally, to the district’s much needed housing supply of family homes, as identified by the Appeal Inspector in the previous appeal decision (an important material consideration).”

“Ecology Consultant: No Objection subject to conditions [Summary] Reviewed Update Bat Emergence Survey Report and Preliminary Ecological Appraisal and now satisfied sufficient ecological information to support determination of application. Impacts will be minimised such that the proposal is acceptable, subject to conditions.”

“Southern Water: Advice [Summary] Advice and recommendations on landscaping and rainwater harvesting.”

“Representations 6 letters of Objection received from 3 addresses, objecting to application on the following grounds:”

“Loss of an acceptable existing property. • Concerns around highways safety. • Proposed layout constitutes overdevelopment of the site. • Concerns that space is being deliberately reserved for further development to the rear. • Design not in keeping with the street scene. • Loss of privacy and increase in noise/light pollution. • Flood risk and drainage issues.”

“Members noted the planning history of the application.”

“The Committee agreed that the design was in keeping with the character of the area.”

“That DC/26/0741 be approved in accordance with officer recommendation.”