One dwelling at 3 Orchard Close, Small Dole, Henfield

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Horsham Planning Committee on 12 May 2026.

DC/26/0155Approved

What was proposed

Permission in principle was sought for one dwelling, with access, layout, design and landscaping reserved for a later technical details stage.

“Permission in Principle is sought for the development of land at 3 Orchard Close, Small Dole, Henfield, for one residential dwelling, with matters of layout, access, design and landscaping reserved for a later Technical Details Consent stage should Permission in Principle be granted.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a large rear garden with outbuildings and a disused pool, outside the built-up area boundary and beside the South Downs National Park.

“The proposal relates to the subdivision of the rear garden, with the new dwelling proposed to be located to the east of the host dwelling. The rear garden is relatively large and currently contains a number of domestic outbuildings together with a disused swimming pool.”

“The application site sits on the eastern edge of Small Dole. The defined built-up area boundary (BUAB) of Small Dole runs through the rear garden of the site, with the main house within the defined BUAB, and its entire rear garden outside the defined BUAB. Beyond this, the transition to the countryside is marked in part by the presence of a caravan park to the north and a private track which extends eastwards from the end of the residential area.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the contained proposal’s limited policy conflict was outweighed by the housing contribution and absence of overriding technical constraints.

“Whilst the proposal would deliver only a single dwelling, it would nevertheless make a small contribution towards addressing the identified housing shortfall and assisting in boosting the supply of housing, consistent with the objectives of the National Planning Policy Framework.”

“Taking these matters together, the proposal would result in a limited degree of conflict with the development plan due to its location outside the Built-Up Area Boundary. However, this harm is considered to be relatively limited given the contained nature of the site and its close relationship with existing residential development. When weighed against the benefits of delivering additional housing in the context of the Council’s housing land supply shortfall…”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Consultees raised no in-principle objection, subject to later details on trees, drainage, access, parking, cycle storage and other technical matters.

“Southern Water: Comment [Summary] No objections raised but would require foul/surface water drainage disposal connection details at Technical Details Stage.”

“As per the application type, details have not been provided in regard to dwelling size (number of bedrooms) or internal site layout. At Technical Details Consent stage, the LHA would expect details to be provided demonstrating proposed vehicular access arrangements to the site, sufficient space for parking and turning of vehicles in accordance with WSCC Parking Standards.”

Officer report

Members’ discussion

Members noted the planning history and asked for clarification about preserving trees on the site.

“Members noted the planning history of the application.”

“Members requested clarification regarding the preservation of trees on the site.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The committee approved the application in accordance with the officer recommendation, and two ward members did not vote.

“[As Ward Members for Bramber, Upper Beeding and Woodmancote Councillor Mike Croker and Councillor Rogel Noel did not vote on the application]”

“That DC/26/0155 be approved in accordance with officer recommendation.”

Minutes

The decision

Permission in principle was approved for the proposed single dwelling and associated development.

“The Head of Development and Building Control reported that the application sought permission in principle for the erection of a single dwelling and associated development. The Committee considered the report as set out in the agenda.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Horsham Planning Committee minutes, 12 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Horsham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Horsham
Date
Tuesday 12 May 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

39 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →