Brickwork and uPVC windows at Land Between 22 Catterick Way, Borehamwood

“DEVELOPMENT Variation of conditions 2 (approved plans and drawings) and 14 (samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces) to allow for the replacement of hanging tiles with brickwork and revision of window materials from composite timber/aluminium to uPVC following grant of planning permission 24/0414/FUL.”

“The assessment made under original application reference: 24/0414/FUL would remain accurate and the assessment under this current application need only assess the impact on the character and appearance of the amended external materials. The proposed amendment to the brickwork is considered to maintain a high- quality design and materiality and is considered acceptable.”

“The application site is located to the north-east of Catterick Way, within a former garage site that abuts Aberford Park. The site has a rectangular form with access from Catterick Way and Croxdale Road. The application site is within the settlement of Borehamwood and within a 20-minute walk from the Elstree and Borehamwood Thameslink Station and the local amenities within The Boulevard shopping park and the Borehamwood High Street.”

“Affinity Water Limited No comments Architectural Liaison Officer (Police) No concerns. The windows meet the security requirements. Arboriculture- Place Services- Essex County Council No objection Environmental Health & Licensing No comments…”

“26/0385/VOC Land Between 22 Catterick Way And 158, Croxdale Road, Borehamwood The Planning Officer presented the application which was for: ‘Variation of conditions 2 (approved plans and drawings) and 14 (samples of the materials to be used in the construction of the external surfaces) to allow for the replacement of hanging tiles with brickwork and revision of window materials from composite timber/aluminium to uPVC following grant of planning permission 24/0414/FUL.”

“In response to a Member query, the Planning Officer gave clarification that the development had begun and the building had been partially built in the time the application had been received. As such, the Council as the applicant were in breach of planning conditions 2 and 14 until approved by the Committee to regularise this.”

“It was proposed by: Councillor D Lambert, seconded by Councillor B Rosehill that the recommendations as set out in the report be agreed.”

“For: (11 total) - Councillors M Allen, M Amron, H Green, A Kaza, D Lambert, R Georgiou, M Handley, P Morris, P Richards, B Rosehill, N Susman, Against: (0 total) – No Votes Abstain: (1 total) – Councillor G Briski Total votes cast: 12”

“RESOLVED that Permission be GRANTED subject to conditions.”