Land North And West Of Fields End View Benwick Road Doddington Cambridgeshire Data via plota.co.uk

F/YR26/0049/BNGP - Biodiversity net gain plan Approved

Proposal

Details reserved by condition 2 (BNG) of planning permission (Change of use of land for dog walking areas, erection of a shelter and 1.5m high boundary fencing, and formation of a car parking area (part-retrospective)) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
27 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
23 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
29 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
17 Mar 2026

Approved on 17 Mar 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 2 discharged

    • ConditionsDetails reserved by condition 2 (BNG) of planning permission F/ (Change of use of land for dog…This applicationF/YR26/0049/BNGP

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Fenland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Fenland
Application type
Biodiversity net gain plan
Postcode
PE15 0TY
Received
27 Nov 2025
Validated
23 Jan 2026
Ward
Doddington And Wimblington
Parish
Doddington Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
20 Mar 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
17 Mar 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Peter Humphrey Associates Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14512443
Planning Portal ref
PP-14512443
Consultation
29 Jan 2026
Comments by
19 Feb 2026
Statutory expiry
20 Mar 2026
Env. assessment
No
Fenland
Planning Authority Score
6.1/10
Average
#98 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Fenland is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #58 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (93%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Fenland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
87%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #170 of 296
93%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #128 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #58 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #163 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
194 decided (1-9 homes)
77%
Major dwellings approved
26 decided (10+ homes)
90%
Change of use approved
29 decided
604
Total decisions
79 refused in the year to March 2026