Replacement flagpole at St Michaels Church Tower, Beccles

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by East Suffolk Planning Committee North on 12 May 2026.

DC/26/0914/LBCApproved

What was proposed

Listed building consent was sought to replace the existing flagpole with an eight-metre flagpole and repair the timber roof structure.

“Listed Building Consent is sought for the replacement of an existing flagpole including repairs to accommodate the flagpole within the timber roof structure.”

“Listed Building Consent is sought to replace a flagpole that was previously removed from the tower due to its condition. The proposed flagpole will measure 8m high and includes various other works including: • Removal of the central lead covered vertical support • Repairs to the timber beams • Installation of lighting conductor within the body of the flagpole • Reinstatement of lead roof covering • Existing ‘duck boarding’ to be reinstated and central section infilled •…”

Officer report

The site and its history

The site is a Grade I listed church tower in Beccles Town Centre and Conservation Area, with several listed buildings nearby.

“The site comprises the Grade I listed St Michaels Church Tower which is situated within Beccles Town Centre and Conservation Area. To the North of the tower is the Grade I Listed St Michaels Church, to the east and south are various commercial premises and the west is the cemetery for the church. Immediately surrounding the site are also several Grade II Listed Buildings and Structures.”

Officer report

Earlier flagpole history

The existing flagpole was removed because of its condition, while officers considered retaining a flagpole important to the tower’s landmark role.

“Retention of a flagpole feature is important to the function of the tower as a visual focal point and landmark feature in the historic centre of Beccles. It remains in use as a flagpole, or had done until its deteriorated condition was assessed. Officers consider it of high importance, therefore, that a flagpole is retained as a feature at the top of the tower and support the proposal for replacing the existing beyond repair feature with one that matches.”

“A flagpole at high level on the roof of the tower will always be highly exposed and vulnerable to weathering and potential deterioration. Replacement over time has already an established precedent here and officers accept the further replacement of the existing flagpole in principle. 50”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers considered the works acceptable, policy-compliant and unlikely to harm the listed structure, nearby heritage assets, neighbouring amenity or protected species.

“The works are considered to result in no negative impacts upon the listed structure, nearby heritage assets, the amenity of neighbouring land users or protected species. Therefore, the application is deemed complaint with all relevant local and national planning policy, and as such it is recommended that planning permission is granted.”

Officer report

Consultation and public views

The Town Council had no objection, Historic England had no comment, and the Beccles Society raised concerns about materials, ties and historic leadwork.

“Consultee Date consulted Date reply received Beccles Town Council 20 March 2026 21 April 2026 Summary of comments: No Objection…”

“Consultee Date consulted Date reply received The Beccles Society N/A 10 April 2026 Summary of comments: The Beccles Society would have preferred that the existing flagpole was repaired rather than replaced with a thinner pole of modern materials but given its exposure and the long-term maintenance benefits we can understand the desire to change materials. We would express some concern over the diagonal ties and how visible these might be from the ground.”

Officer report

What members discussed

The Chair said the Town Council was supportive and that damage caused by the old flagpole helped explain the proposed change.

“The Chair commented that the Town Council were very supportive, the old flagpole caused damage to the roof, so that was part of the rationale for changing. On the proposal of Councillor Plummer, seconded by Councillor Ashdown it was…”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee approved the application, subject to conditions requiring compliance with the time limit and approved plans.

“That the application be approved. In conclusion, the principle and detail of the development is considered to be acceptable and in compliance with relevant development plan policies and the National Planning Policy Framework. Conditions: 1) Time Limit 2) Compliance with approved plans 9”

Minutes

Sources

  • East Suffolk Planning Committee North minutes, 12 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of East Suffolk's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 12 May 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

32 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →