Cobham Sports And Social Club Merley Park Road Poole BH21 3DA Data via plota.co.uk

P/26/00440/FUL - Full Planning Permission Approved

Proposal

Installation of additional Flood lighting to the existing artificial grass sports pitch (Retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
2 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
9 Feb 2026
✓
Committee
14 May 2026
✓
Approved
22 May 2026

Approved on 22 May 2026 · Committee · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by BCP Western BCP Planning Committee on 14 May 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the lighting would not materially harm visual or residential amenity, subject to a condition.
  • Four letters objected, citing light protrusion, lost sky views, biodiversity concerns and alleged breaches of the earlier permission.
  • The committee voted four to one, with three abstentions, and granted permission in line with the officer’s recommendation.
Read how the committee decided The full page covers the proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers, conditions and committee decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of BCP's committee minutes of 14 May 2026.

Site constraints 4

Green belt: South West Hampshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Inside the Merley built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in BCP - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
BCP
Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
BH21 3DA
Received
2 Feb 2026
Validated
9 Feb 2026
Ward
Bearwood & Merley
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted
Decision date
22 May 2026
Decision level
Committee
Agent
Chapman Lily Planning Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 102 days from validation, 43 days slower than BCP's median of 59 for commercial and major works. Approved, as 90% of commercial and major works here are.

49%decided within 8 weeks
90%approved
42decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by BCP in the last twelve months, from validation. BCP decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
6 Apr 2026
Comments by
27 Apr 2026
Committee
14 May 2026
BCP
Planning Authority Score
1.7/10
Poor
#279 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

BCP is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #256 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 60% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
BCP decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #233 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #214 of 296
44%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #256 of 296
60%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #267 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
346 decided (1-9 homes)
68%
Major dwellings approved
56 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
78 decided
2,244
Total decisions
392 refused in the year to March 2026