Top Yard Farm Top Yard Baumber Lincolnshire LN9 5PB Data via plota.co.uk

03688/25/ABC - Prior Approval - Agricultural/Forestry Approved

Proposal

Determination of whether or not Prior Approval is required for the siting, design and external appearance of a storage shed to be erected Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
9 Dec 2025
✓
Consultation
11 Dec 2025
✓
Approved
24 Dec 2025

Approved on 24 Dec 2025 · Last checked 6 Jul 2026

Site constraints 3

Agricultural land, grade 1
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Lindsey - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Prior Approval - Agricultural/Forestry
Postcode
LN9 5PB
Received
21 Nov 2025
Validated
9 Dec 2025
Ward
Roughton Ward
Parish
Baumber
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 Jan 2026
Decision
Not required
Decision date
24 Dec 2025
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 15 days from validation, 41 days faster than East Lindsey's median of 56 for commercial and major works. Approved, as 96% of commercial and major works here are.

52%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
72decided in the last year

Plota live figures for commercial and major works decided by East Lindsey in the last twelve months, from validation. East Lindsey decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
11 Dec 2025
Comments by
25 Dec 2025
Statutory expiry
5 Jan 2026
Env. assessment
No
East Lindsey
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#171 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Lindsey ranks #182 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 47% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Lindsey decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #36 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #105 of 296
60%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #182 of 296
47%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #206 of 296
86%
Minor dwellings approved
146 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
24 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
109 decided
817
Total decisions
53 refused in the year to March 2026