Land Parcel Known As Kingston Paradise Field Kingston On Soar Gotham Data via plota.co.uk

26/01270/AGRIC - Agricultural notifications Refused

Proposal

Works to complete a liquid storage lagoon with Earth banks. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
27 Jul 2026
✓
Consultation
21 Aug 2026
✗
Refused
21 Aug 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 21 Aug 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 22 Aug 2026

Site constraints 8

Public footpath 7 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
1 listed building within 150 m
Nearest: Gotham Primary School, Grade II, 55 m away
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; SSSI 457 m away: Gotham Hill Pasture SSSI; Green belt 6 m away: Derby and Nottingham; Inside the Gotham built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Agricultural notifications
Postcode
NG11 0JS
Received
27 Jul 2026
Validated
27 Jul 2026
Ward
Leake
Parish
West Leake
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Aug 2026
Decision
Prior Approval Refused
Decision date
21 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Andrew Large Surveyors Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 25 days from validation, 15 days faster than Rushcliffe's median of 40 for prior approvals. Refused, as 28% of prior approvals here are.

91%decided within 8 weeks
72%approved
56decided in the last year

Plota live figures for prior approvals decided by Rushcliffe in the last twelve months, from validation. Rushcliffe decision record →

Public comments

7comments received
7 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

7 neighbours consulted · Last counted 22 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
21 Aug 2026
Consultation
21 Aug 2026
Comments by
12 Sept 2026
Site or press notice
29 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
24 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026