Land At Croup Hill South Of Beaconsyde Farm Broadoaks Murton SR7 9SF Data via plota.co.uk

DM/26/00031/DRC - Details Reserved by Condition Approved

Proposal

Discharge of Conditions 5 (Access Track Improvement), 6 (Access Condition Survey) and 11 (Landscaping) pursuant to appeal reference APP/ (Planning Reference ) Figure LS01 Landscaping Scheme Schedule of Landscape Maintenance and Management Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
6 Jan 2026
✓
Validated
7 Jan 2026
✓
Consultation
17 Mar 2026
✓
Approved
1 Apr 2026

Approved on 1 Apr 2026 · DRC Delegated · Last checked 1 Aug 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullRefusedcouncil archive

    Conditions 5, 6, 11 discharged

    • ConditionsDischarge of Conditions 5 (Access Track Improvement), 6 (Access Condition Survey) and 11…This applicationDM/26/00031/DRC

Site constraints 5

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; National infrastructure project: Morven Hawthorn Pit Grid Connection Project, at pre-application; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Details Reserved by Condition
Postcode
SR7 9SF
Received
6 Jan 2026
Validated
7 Jan 2026
Ward
Murton
Parish
Murton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
4 Mar 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
1 Apr 2026
Decision level
DRC Delegated
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 1 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14603136
Planning Portal ref
PP-14603136
Consultation
17 Mar 2026
Comments by
31 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
4 Mar 2026
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026