House extensions and render at 3 Lyndale Road, Bramcote

What was proposed

The application proposed two-storey side and rear extensions, a single-storey rear extension and white render to the front of the house.

“The application is brought to the Committee at the request of Councillor D Watts. Purpose of the Report 1.1 The application seeks planning permission for the construction of a two storey side and rear extension, a single storey rear extension and to apply white render to the front elevation. Recommendation The Committee is asked to RESOLVE that planning permission be approved for the reasons outlined in the appendix. 3.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a detached two-storey dwelling in a built-up residential area, with detached homes and existing extensions nearby.

“The application site consists of a two storey detached dwelling, with an existing single storey rear extension. In regards to neighbouring properties, the site is located in a built up residential area of Bramcote. Lyndale Road is a detached two storey dwelling located to the south east of the application site, this property has a single storey rear extension and a two storey side extension.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

One neighbour supported the proposal, while two objected over scale, light, privacy, parking, enclosure, character, traffic, care access, drainage and overdevelopment.

“Planning Committee 16 September 2026 • Cllr A Kingdon – no comments received • Cllr D Watts – called in to committee. Advised that whilst the proposed extension can benefit the occupants of the application property, there are concerns that extension could create a terrace effect between nos.”

“Five neighbours were consulted on the application. There responses were received, one in support of the proposed development and two raising objections. The objections can be summarised as follows: • Massing and Scale being disproportionate to the existing dwelling • Loss of light • Loss of privacy • Impact on parking • Sense of enclosure • Impact on character of the area • Impact on quality of life • Impact on highway/ increase in traffic • Impact on essential care…”

Officer report

Who spoke

No public speakers took part, and the application had been brought to the committee by Councillor D K Watts.

Committee debate

The debate included a statement that no objection had been received from surrounding neighbours.

“The Committee opened the debate, which included that no objected has been received from the surrounding neighbours.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee resolved to grant permission under delegated authority, subject to conditions covering commencement, approved plans and materials.

“RESOLVED that the Head of Planning and Economic Development be given delegated authority to grant planning permission subject to:”

“The proposed extensions shall be constructed using the materials annotated on the approved plans unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”

Minutes