Herne Bay Table Table The Boulevard Herne Bay Kent CT6 6GZ Data via plota.co.uk

Proposal

Proposed alterations to fenestrations at ground and first floor levels of existing restaurant; replacement cladding; installation of new and replacement plant to first floor flat roof; erection of rear refuse service enclosure following demolition of existing single storey rear extension; alterations to parking, landscaping and boundary treatments. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
23 Jan 2026
Decision
Expected by 20 Mar 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 12 Sept 2026; it is now day 232.

Documents 88

Consultation & comments 77

PDF SHARON REILLY Public Comment · 1 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF SARA SWEENEY - KITEWOOD Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF MICHELLE CROSS Public Comment · 17 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF KCC HIGHWAYS Consultee Comment · 16 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF HERNE & BROOMFIELD PARISH COUNCIL Public Comment · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS FAYE CLARKE Public Comment · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MS LINDA BIDDOLPH Public Comment · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS BARBARA BIDDOLPH Public Comment · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MS GILLIAN BIDDOLPH Public Comment · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS ELEANOR ROSS Public Comment · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS POPPY QUINNEY Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MS JANICE MINER Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MS KATERINA HIMEROVA Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS LISA TULL Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR LEE CROSS Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS NATASHA TORO Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS CHARLOTTE PHELPS Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR FRAZIER MULFORD-LAWLOR Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS CHAR W Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR COLIN PEARCE Public Comment · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS JODIE GASKING Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR AIDAN SMYTH Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS PAM WALDER Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS SUE MARTIN Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS FREYA CHRISTIE Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS SARAH BARLOW Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS MICHELLE LEE Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR JOSEPH LEE Public Comment · 25 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS REBECCA CLARK Public Comment · 24 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS LISA CUTHBERT Public Comment · 24 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF LOUISE CONNELL Public Comment · 24 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR JOHN PLEASE Public Comment · 24 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS REBECCA PATTISON Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS FLORENCE SMYTH Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS LUCY RIGDEN Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR JAMIE COOPER Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS CLAIRE BALDRY Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS MICHELLE KEEN Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS SARAH TURNER Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS GRACE MARTIN Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR JACOB YATES Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS LEONI JOHANNS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR HARRY PHILLIPS-JENNINGS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR CALLUM FRIEND Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS GILLIAN MARTIN Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MS JESSICA BURROWS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS TRUE RAINBOW Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS LEAH WARD Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS LINDA WITTS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR NICHOLAS BERRY Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS CARLY BERRY Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS SALLY PHELPS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS MARTHA CHURCH Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR DAN MATTHEWS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR SIMON THUNDOW Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MS DENIZE LIPYEAT Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS CLAIRE SOLOMONS Public Comment · 23 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS KAREN CORDINGLEY Public Comment · 22 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS HELEN SMITH Public Comment · 22 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS MICHELLE CROSS Public Comment · 22 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS ELEANOR CROSS Public Comment · 22 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR OLLIE CROSS Public Comment · 22 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS JO FINCH Public Comment · 21 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS SARAH CARPENTER Public Comment · 21 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS LEANNE GROVER Public Comment · 21 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS NICOLA TULL Public Comment · 21 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS R GARRETT Public Comment · 21 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS ASHLEIGH PHIPPS Public Comment · 21 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS DAWN RUMBOLD Public Comment · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MR DAVID RUMBOLD Public Comment · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS SAMANTHA THOMPSON Public Comment · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MRS CAROLINE JONES Public Comment · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF MISS JENELL MCKINNELL Public Comment · 19 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF SOUTHERN GAS NETWORKS Consultee Comment · 18 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF SOUTHERN GAS NETWORKS Consultee Comment · 18 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF SOUTHERN GAS NETWORKS Consultee Comment · 18 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH Consultee Comment · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 2, surveyed
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). From a field survey (Reading). The older provisional map agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Herne Bay built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Canterbury - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Canterbury
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
CT6 6GZ
Received
23 Jan 2026
Validated
23 Jan 2026
Ward
Beltinge
Case officer
Show
Target decision
20 Mar 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Planware Ltd

Decision outlook

Day 232, past the statutory target. 92% of demolitions in Canterbury are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 7 Sept 2026.

Day 232176 days past the 56-day target
74%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
55decided in the last year

Plota live figures for demolitions decided by Canterbury in the last twelve months, from validation. Canterbury decision record →

Public comments

74comments received
69 objecting2 neutral3 supporting

93% object · above the UK average of 75%

19 neighbours consulted · Last counted 7 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
20 Mar 2026
Canterbury
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#158 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Canterbury is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #259 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Canterbury decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #18 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #27 of 296
43%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #259 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #176 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
95%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
29 decided
925
Total decisions
45 refused in the year to March 2026