Four-bedroom HMO at 25 Upper High Street, Rhymney, Tredegar
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Caerphilly Planning Committee on 13 May 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to change a dwelling into a four-bedroom house in multiple occupation, with a rear-garden bike store and no other alterations.
“House type: The host dwelling is a mid-terrace two storey dwelling. The dwelling is finished externally in render, the windows are uPVC, the front door is brown uPVC and the roof is concrete tiles. The dwelling faces Upper High Street, with its main access leading into the ground floor. Internally, the ground floor contains an entrance hall, lounge, dining room, kitchen and a bathroom. The first floor contains three bedrooms.”
“Development: The proposed development is to change the use of the dwelling from a C3 dwelling to a C4 House in Multiple Occupation. No internal or external alterations are proposed, however one of the reception rooms at ground floor would be used as a bedroom instead of a lounge. The proposed HMO would have 4 bedrooms. A bike store would be sited in the rear garden area.”
Officer report
Consultation and objections
Transport and environmental health officers raised no objection, while the community council objected and residents submitted 110 letters and a petition.
“Environmental Health Manager - No objection.”
“Rhymney Community Council - Objection: Due to unacceptable impact on neighbourhood and lack of transparency regarding the future occupiers.”
Officer report
Main concerns raised
Concerns included parking, noise, disruption, local facilities, fire escapes, antisocial behaviour, safeguarding, waste, transparency and loss of a family home.
“Summary of observations: The objections received can be summarised as follows: The proposal will impact an already difficult area for parking. Multiple persons living at this property will impact neighbours. The local facilities cannot cope with additional people. Noise and disruption would increase. There is a lack of fire escapes. The proposal will increase antisocial behaviour.”
“Greater strain on the Police. There is a school nearby. Safeguarding issues of school children. Increased number of people will increase waste. There has been a lack of transparency through the process. The accommodation should be used for a local need. Loss of a family home.”
Officer report
Who spoke
A local resident and the local ward member spoke against the application, while the agent spoke in support.
The committee vote
The committee agreed by a majority to defer the application for further information, with seven votes for, six against and one abstention.
“Following consideration of the application it was moved and seconded that the application be deferred for further information. By way of Microsoft Forms (and in noting there were 7 For, 6 Against and 1 Abstention) this was agreed by the majority present.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was deferred for further information.
“(i) the application be DEFERRED for further information.”
Minutes
Sources
- Caerphilly Planning Committee minutes, 13 May 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Caerphilly's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Caerphilly Planning Committee
- Council
- Caerphilly
- Date
- Wednesday 13 May 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Vote
- 7 for, 6 against, 1 abstained
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Caerphilly committee decisions →
Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.
This committee's year
31 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.