Two side extensions at Moss Cottage, 27 Church Lane, Cossall

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Broxtowe Planning Committee on 18 Mar 2026.

26/00038/FULApprovedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application proposed single-storey side extensions on both sides of the dwelling, including a garage on the west side.

“Purpose of the Report 1.1 The application seeks planning permission for a single storey side extension to the west elevation to form a garage and a single storey side extension to the east elevation. 2. Recommendation The Committee is asked to RESOLVE that planning permission be refused for the reasons outlined in the appendix. 3.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a detached dwelling in a residential Green Belt area, within a conservation area and near listed and local-interest buildings.

“The site is located in a residential area within the Nottinghamshire Green Belt. Directly to the rear, there is 29’s rear garden. Directly adjacent to the site, to the east and west are located 25 (Glebe farm Cottage) and 29 (The Manor House) Church Lane respectively. To the north are located 40 Church Lane (Chestnut Croft) and 8 Willoughby Almhouses.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

The property previously received permission for a two-storey rear extension, and the permission was implemented.

“The application property has had planning permission for a two storey rear extension (10/00698/FUL). According to our records, this planning permission has been implemented.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the proposed extensions would create a disproportionate addition and harm the Green Belt, outweighing the benefits.

“Green Belt The application site is situated within the Green Belt and therefore the principle of development is subject to whether or not it complies with local and national Green Belt policy. Broxtowe’s Part 2 Local Plan (2019) Policy 8 states that development in the Green Belt will be determined in accordance with the NPPF.”

“The volume calculations included as a part of previous extensions amount to 123m³ which represents an increase of 37%. The proposed extension would add 123.28m³, bringing the total volume addition to the original dwelling to 214.7m³, which represents an increase of 64.76% to the original volume.”

Officer report

Design and neighbours

Officers considered the design acceptable and found no significant effect on neighbouring amenity, while the extensions would provide living space and a garage.

“Design 6.2.1 The proposed single storey extensions would have a traditional design. The roof style is considered to match the style of the original dwelling and the existing two storey rear extension as they are gables. It is considered that the extensions achieve an acceptable level of design and will not result in a negative impact on the character of the existing property or the street scene.”

“The proposed development is of an acceptable design and would provide additional living space and a garage to the benefit of the residents. Neighbour amenity has been assessed and is considered that there would be no significant impact. However, the proposal represents a disproportionate addition to the original dwelling that is harmful to the Green Belt.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The conservation adviser raised no objection subject to a natural timber garage door, and one neighbour supported the proposal without objection.

“The Council’s Conservation Adviser was consulted on this application and raised no objections to the proposed development. The Conservation Adviser recommends the following condition: The new timber garage door facing the front elevation must be natural timber Reason: to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area streetscene.”

“Three neighbouring properties were consulted on the application and a site notice was placed on 12 February 2026 near the application site. One response was received raising no objections to the proposed development and in support of it.”

Officer report

Committee debate

There were no public speakers, and members debated Green Belt policy relating to refusal recommendations and the size of the proposed development.

“Construct single storey side extension to east elevation and single storey side extension to west elevation to form garage Moss Cottage, 27 Church Lane, Cossall The application is brought to the Committee at the request of Cllr Pringle as the application site is within Nottinghamshire Green Belt. There were no late items. There were no public speakers for this item.”

Minutes

The committee decision

The committee resolved to approve planning permission, subject to conditions on commencement, approved drawings and materials including a natural timber garage door.

“RESOLVED that planning permission be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. The development hereby permitted shall be commenced before the expiration of three years beginning with the date of this permission.”

“The proposed development shall be constructed using materials as annotated on the approved plans unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The new timber garage door on the street facing front elevation must be natural timber. Composite or synthetic timber materials are not permitted.”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The minutes do not record the members' reasons for departing from the officers' recommendation.

Sources

  • Broxtowe Planning Committee minutes, 18 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Broxtowe's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Broxtowe
Date
Wednesday 18 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Approved, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 7 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →