Short-term let accommodation at 9 Dewar Place Lane, Edinburgh

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 13 May 2026.

25/03609/FULSTLRefused

What was proposed

The application sought retrospective permission to change a house into short-term let accommodation, with no internal or external physical changes.

“The surrounding area is a mix of residential and commercial. At the west end of the lane is the West End police station and car park. Beside the police station on the north side are authorised short term lets (STLs). Eastwards from there and extending to the end of the lane, including opposite the application property, is the rear of the Hub by Premier Inn Hotel and associated car park. There is one office on the north side of the lane.”

“The application is for a change of use from residential to short term let (sui generis). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant advises that the short term let use has been in operation since 10 September 2022. Therefore, the application is retrospective.”

Officer report

The site

The property is a three-storey mews townhouse in a mixed residential and commercial area within the West End Conservation Area.

“The application property is a three-storey mews town-house at 9 Dewar Place Lane in the west end of the city. There is a hall, store, and WC on the ground floor. The first floor has a living/dining and kitchen area, and the second floor accommodates two bedrooms and a bathroom. The property has its own main door entrance and there is no shared or private amenity space.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Two earlier short-term let applications were refused, and Local Review Body decisions upheld both refusals.

“25.03.2025 Local Review Body decision - Uphold (application refused).”

“22.05.2024 Local Review Body decision -Uphold (application refused).”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended refusal because the loss of residential accommodation was not justified by the proposed economic benefits.

“It is recommended that this application be Refused subject to the details below.”

“The loss of the residential accommodation has not been justified. Whilst it is recognised that there is an economic benefit to the city as a whole from the provision of tourist accommodation, in this case it does not outweigh the adverse impact on loss of residential accommodation. The proposal does not comply with NPF policy 30(e) (ii). There are no material considerations that outweigh this conclusion. The proposal is unacceptable.”

Officer report

Public views

Twenty-eight representations supported the proposal, citing economic benefits and limited amenity impact, while the community council objected to housing and amenity effects.

“A total of 29 representations have been received, 28 in support, including a petition, and one objection. The petition in support was submitted by the agent who is the lead coordinator, and it has 23 signatories. It is noted that five of the petition signatories have also submitted comments in support and seven of the commenters provided no reasons for supporting the proposal. An objection has been received from the West End Community Council.”

“- Brings economic benefits. - There will be no negative impact on residential amenity. - The STL use will comply with licensing requirements. - STLs are a valuable alternative to hotels. - This is a good location for STL use.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the report, including that the loss of residential accommodation was not justified.

“25/03609/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

  • Hal OslerChairLib DemFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Max MitchellVice-ChairConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Joan GriffithsLabourFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • David KeySNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Martha Mattos CoelhoSNPFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Joanna MowatConservativeFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Alys MumfordGreenFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Chas BoothSubstitute for ParkerGreenFor refusal(no vote against recorded)
  • Neil RossSubstitute for LangLib DemFor refusal(no vote against recorded)

The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 13 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Edinburgh
Date
Wednesday 13 May 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Councillors
9Conservative 2Green 2Lib Dem 2SNP 2Labour 1Show votes
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

228 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →