Land south west of Foxons Corner, Fosse Way, Monks Kirby, Rugby, CV23 0RT Data via plota.co.uk

R26/0069 - 8 Weeks PA Refused

Proposal

Retrospective extension of existing gypsy and traveller site by 3 residential pitches. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
9 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
24 Mar 2026
✗
Refused
14 Aug 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 14 Aug 2026 · Committee · Last checked 16 Aug 2026

Site constraints 3

Rugby District (B)
Green belt: Birmingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Rugby District (B)Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rugby - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rugby
Application type
8 Weeks PA
Postcode
CV23 0RT
Received
3 Mar 2026
Validated
9 Mar 2026
Ward
Revel & Binley Woods
Parish
Monks Kirby, Withybrook
Case officer
Show
Target decision
28 Apr 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
14 Aug 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 158 days from validation, 106 days slower than Rugby's median of 52 for new homes. Refused, as 28% of new homes here are.

52%decided within 8 weeks
72%approved
13%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Rugby in the last twelve months, from validation. Rugby decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Comments by
16 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
9 Mar 2026
Statutory expiry
26 May 2026
Rugby
Planning Authority Score
2.7/10
Poor
#243 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rugby is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #271 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 57% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (94%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rugby decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #65 of 296
94%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #115 of 296
38%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #271 of 296
57%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #260 of 296
93%
Minor dwellings approved
28 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
88%
Change of use approved
8 decided
466
Total decisions
31 refused in the year to March 2026