Extra care unit amendments at Loen, St Catherines Road, Frimley, Camberley

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Surrey Heath Planning Applications Committee on 20 Aug 2026.

26/0270/PMRApproved

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the amendments were acceptable and would not materially affect character, neighbours, highways, drainage, ecology or biodiversity.

“The proposed amendments are acceptable in principle and would have no material impact on the principle of development, or the consideration of the impact of the development on the Countryside Beyond the Green Belt as concluded in the original application.”

“The application is therefore recommended for approval subject to conditions. A deed of variation will be required to the signed s106 legal agreement to reflect the updated application reference.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Highways and several other consultees raised no objection, while Surrey Wildlife Trust recommended ecological review of the amended proposals.

“Joint Waste Solution Raise no objection. Lead Local Flood Authority Raise no objection. Natural England No response received. However, no objections raised to the previous application and the proposed development would not alter the ecological consideration of the development. Fisher German No response received.”

“Officer response: Officers have reviewed the development against the original ecological appraisal and do not consider there are any additional concerns raised. Prior to any demolition the applicant would still need have a requirement to apply for a bat mitigation license. Surrey Fire Raise no objection and provide guidance. Environment Agency No comments to make. Network Rail No response received. However, no objections raised to previous applications.”

Officer report

What people said

One objection said St Catherines Road could not safely accommodate increased traffic; officers said the amendments would not increase highway impacts.

“The table below summarises the material planning reasons for objection:”

“St Catherines Road is not suitable for the increase in traffic. The principle of development has been established under 24/0922/FFU and the proposed amendments would not impact further on the surrounding highway network. No objections were raised by the County Highways Authority.”

Officer report

Members’ questions

Members asked about the outstanding non-material amendment and whether the size increases would affect bedroom sizes or expected occupant numbers.

“Members queried the status of and how a non-material amendment to application 24/0922/FFU (3.2 in the report) would affect the development and officers confirmed that this decision was still outstanding. It was also confirmed by officers that the proposed size increases would not affect proposed bedroom sizes and numbers of expected occupants.”

Minutes

The vote

The recommendation to grant was proposed, seconded and carried, with unanimous support from the councillors listed.

“The officer recommendation to grant the application, subject to conditions and a legal agreement was proposed by Councillor Mary Glauert and seconded by Councillor Richard Wilson, put to the vote and carried.”

“Note 2 Voting for the officer’s recommendation to grant the application subject to conditions and a legal agreement was unanimous from Councillors Shaun Garrett, Mary Glauert, Julie Hoad, David O’Mahoney, Kevin Thompson, David Whitcroft, Helen Whitcroft, Victoria Wheeler, Valerie White and Richard Wilson.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee approved the application subject to a legal agreement and the conditions in the officer and Planning Updates reports.

“RESOLVED that application 26/0270/PMR be approved, subject to a legal agreement and the conditions contained in the officer’s report and Planning Updates report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Surrey Heath Planning Applications Committee minutes, 20 August 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Surrey Heath's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 20 August 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

22 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →