Land At Hill Farm Earl Shilton Road Thurlaston Leicestershire LE9 7TG Data via plota.co.uk

26/0237/DOC - Discharge of Conditions Awaiting decision

Proposal

Discharge of conditions 6 (archaeological evaluation), 10 (biodiversity management plan), 11 (arboricultural method statement),13 (CEMP),14 (soil stripping methodology),17 (surface water drainage),18 (surface water during construction) ,20 (infiltration testing) ,21 (public rights of way management) and 25 (highway dilapidation survey) of permission (Hill Farm solar farm) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Decision
Expected by 9 Jun 2026

As of 6 Aug 2026, the council is no longer showing this application on their planning portal. It may have been withdrawn or re-listed under a different reference. We've stopped checking it for updates.

Documents 28

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 6, 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 25 awaiting decision

    • ConditionsDischarge of conditions 6 (archaeological evaluation), 10 (biodiversity management plan), 11…This application26/0237/DOC

Site constraints 2

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Blaby - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Blaby
Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
LE9 7TG
Received
19 Mar 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Ward
Normanton
Parish
Thurlaston Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
9 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Agent
Lighthouse Development Consulting

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 3 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14778731
Planning Portal ref
PP-14778731
Comments by
4 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
9 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Blaby
Planning Authority Score
4.1/10
Below average
#190 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Blaby is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #237 out of 296. 53% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Blaby decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #76 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #50 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #237 of 296
53%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #239 of 296
81%
Minor dwellings approved
32 decided (1-9 homes)
80%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
80%
Change of use approved
35 decided
467
Total decisions
37 refused in the year to March 2026