One dwellinghouse at Hollybank, Biggar Road, Carnwath, Lanark
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by South Lanarkshire Planning Committee on 11 Aug 2026.
What was proposed
Planning permission in principle was sought for one dwellinghouse, associated works and a new access from the shared private road.
“Description of Proposed Development 3.1. Planning permission in principle is sought for the erection of one dwellinghouse and associated works. The submitted site plan identifies an indicative house siting within the existing vegetation and a new vehicular access from the shared private road.”
“No detailed design, siting, scale, drainage or landscaping proposals have been submitted. If planning permission in principle were granted, those matters would require to be addressed through a subsequent application for approval of matters specified in conditions.”
Officer report
The site
The site is rough grassland with trees and dense vegetation between two properties, beside an unlit rural road and agricultural land.
“Site Description 2.1. The application site comprises approximately 0.47 hectares of rough grassland on the west side of the B7016, Biggar Road, within the rural area south of Carnwath. The land contains mature and semi-mature broadleaf trees, areas of dense vegetation and established grassland.”
“The site is positioned between Hollybank to the east and Bank Cottage to the west. A shared private access road bounds the site to the north and connects with the B7016 Biggar Road at its junction with Bankhead Road. Agricultural land lies to the south and forms the wider setting of the small group of houses…”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier application for a dwellinghouse on the same site was refused and the current proposal had to be assessed against newer policies.
“Relevant Planning History 4.1. Application P/19/0168 for planning permission in principle for a dwellinghouse on the same site was previously refused.”
“The previous decision predates the adoption of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and National Planning Framework 4. The current application requires to be assessed anew against the current development plan and other material considerations.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended refusal because the proposal lacked rural housing policy support and raised road safety, sustainable travel, tree and biodiversity concerns.
“Sustainable Travel and Local Living Policy 13 of National Planning Framework 4 requires the transport requirements generated by development to be considered in accordance with the sustainable travel hierarchy. Development should, where appropriate, provide convenient links to local facilities by walking, wheeling and cycling and be accessible by public transport.”
“The proposed use would intensify an existing junction with substantially substandard visibility and would prejudice road safety. In addition, the site is poorly connected to services and facilities by active or sustainable travel and, in the absence of an identified locational need, the proposal would not promote sustainable travel or contribute positively to local living.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Roads officers objected over inadequate visibility, while Scottish Water confirmed water capacity and an archaeological group advised a watching brief if permission was granted.
“Scottish Water – Advise that there is currently sufficient capacity at Coulter Water Treatment Works. There is no public wastewater infrastructure in the vicinity and private treatment options would require to be investigated. Response: Noted. Water supply and foul drainage details could be considered at the detailed stage if the principle of development were acceptable.”
“West of Scotland Archaeological Society - The site is within an archaeological consultation trigger area associated with the possible route of a Roman road. If permission were granted, an archaeological watching brief should be secured by condition. Response: Noted.”
Officer report
Resident concerns
One representation questioned the boundary, associated works, the dwelling’s position and its relationship with the earlier refused application.
“The western boundary does not show an intervening strip of land understood to be in separate ownership • Clarification is sought regarding the meaning of associated works • Concern that the indicative position of the dwelling is closer to the neighbouring property than previously discussed • Clarification is sought regarding the relationship with the previous refused application…”
“The submitted red-line boundary defines the application site and planning permission would not confer rights to undertake works on land outside the applicant's control. The detailed position and design of a dwelling are not fixed by this application for planning permission in principle. The previous refusal is a consideration and is addressed in the assessment in Section 10.”
Officer report
Committee debate
Officers answered members’ questions; one councillor moved refusal, while another moved approval with conditions because of wider NPF4 objectives.
“Following discussion, during which officers responded to members’ questions on various aspects of the report, Councillor Nelson, seconded by Councillor Convery, moved that the application be refused for the reasons detailed in the Executive Director’s report.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0293 by R Yarwood for the erection of a house and associated works (Planning Permission in Principle) at Hollybank, Biggar Road, Carnwath, Lanark be refused for the reasons detailed in the Executive Director’s report.”
Minutes
Sources
- South Lanarkshire Planning Committee minutes, 11 August 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of South Lanarkshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- South Lanarkshire Planning Committee
- Council
- South Lanarkshire
- Date
- Tuesday 11 August 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- South Lanarkshire committee decisions →
This committee's year
57 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.