Land At The Rear Of The Brambles Lower Moor Road Coleorton Coalville Leicestershire LE67 8FJ Data via plota.co.uk

25/01591/PIP - Permission In Principle Refused

Proposal

Permission in Principle for the erection of five self-build dwellings Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
20 Nov 2025
✓
Consultation
27 Nov 2025
✗
Refused
20 Apr 2026
Appeal
Appeal lodged

Refused on 20 Apr 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 8 Nov 2026

Planning committee

Decided by North West Leicestershire Planning Committee on 14 Apr 2026.

Refused

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised permitting five self-build homes because their benefits outweighed policy, landscape and heritage harms.
  • Objectors raised concerns about urbanisation, landscape, policy conflict and limited local services; supporters highlighted local homes and planning policy compliance.
  • The committee refused the application because it was outside development limits, conflicted with policies S2 and S3, and harmed Coleorton’s landscape character.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal.

Source: Plota analysis of North West Leicestershire's committee minutes of 14 Apr 2026.

Documents 73

Consultation & comments 43

PDF 3RD PARTY COMMENTS Appeal Correspondence · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 3RD PARTY COMMENTS Appeal Correspondence · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 3RD PARTY COMMENTS Appeal Correspondence · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF 3RD PARTY COMMENTS Appeal Correspondence · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Appellant`s Case · 1 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF APPLICANT RESPONSE TO HISTORIC ENGLAND Appellant`s Case · 1 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 23 Public Comment · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 25 Public Comment · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 21 Public Comment · 8 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 22 Public Comment · 8 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 19 Public Comment · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 20 Public Comment · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 18 Public Comment · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF AGENTS RESPONSE TO CONSERVATION OFFICER COMMENTS Correspondence · 5 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 4 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF CONSERVATION OFFICER RESPONSE Consultation Response · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 3 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 15 Public Comment · 24 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 14 Public Comment · 20 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 13 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF GARDENS TRUST Consultation Response · 9 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 9 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 8 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF COMMENTS FROM APPLICANT IN RESPONSE TO COMMENTS FROM HISTORIC ENGLAND Correspondence · 6 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 10 Public Comment · 3 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 2 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 24 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 07 Public Comment · 22 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF LCC HIGHWAYS Consultation Response · 18 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF COLEORTON PARISH COUNCIL Consultation Response · 18 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF HISTORIC ENGLAND Consultation Response · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF HISTORIC ENGLAND Consultation Response · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF APPLICANT RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS Correspondence · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 17 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 15 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 10 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 03 Public Comment · 9 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF COUNTY ARCHAEOLOGIST RESPONSE Consultation Response · 9 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF COAL AUTHORITY Consultation Response · 5 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Consultation Response · 5 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Public Comment · 4 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF PUBLIC COMMENT 01 Public Comment · 2 Dec 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Registered park or garden about 86 m away: Coleorton Hall
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in North West Leicestershire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Permission In Principle
Postcode
LE67 8FJ
Received
13 Nov 2025
Validated
20 Nov 2025
Ward
Valley
Parish
Coleorton
Case officer
Show
Target decision
24 Apr 2026
Decision
Application Refused
Decision date
20 Apr 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 151 days from validation, 75 days slower than North West Leicestershire's median of 76 for new homes. Refused, as 29% of new homes here are.

34%decided within 8 weeks
71%approved
7%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by North West Leicestershire in the last twelve months, from validation. North West Leicestershire decision record →

Public comments

2comments received
1 objecting1 supporting

45 neighbours consulted · Last counted 8 Nov 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
2 Apr 2026
Consultation
27 Nov 2025
Comments by
27 Dec 2025
Site or press notice
4 Dec 2025
Committee
14 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
25 Dec 2025
Env. assessment
No
North West Leicestershire
Planning Authority Score
4.6/10
Below average
#170 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

North West Leicestershire is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #211 out of 296. 51% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
North West Leicestershire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #23 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #38 of 296
55%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #211 of 296
51%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #231 of 296
84%
Minor dwellings approved
82 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
97%
Change of use approved
38 decided
555
Total decisions
25 refused in the year to March 2026