Five-bedroom HMO at 61 King Street, Gillingham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 21 Oct 2026.

MC/26/1283Refused

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

What was proposed

The application sought to change a dwellinghouse into a five-bedroom house in multiple occupation.

“The Senior Planner outlined the application in detail for the change of use from a dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a 5-bedroom house in multiple occupation (HMO) (Class C4).”

Minutes

Local housing context

A survey identified 111 properties, including four existing HMOs and four properties subdivided into flats.

“The Senior Planner advised that a density assessment had been undertaken using planning history, information provided by Private Sector Housing colleagues and a walking survey of the majority of King Street, north of Jeffery Street. It was evaluated that there were 111 properties in King Street which included four existing HMOs, either registered or benefiting from planning permission, and four properties that had been sub-divided into flats.”

Minutes

Main concern

Members were concerned that the bedrooms were of insufficient size.

“The Committee discussed the application in detail and expressed concern that the bedrooms were of an insufficient size.”

Minutes

Committee discussion

The committee discussed the application and received advice about amendments to the second refusal reason and assessment wording.

“The Senior Planner drew Members’ attention to the supplementary agenda advice sheet, published on the day of the Planning Committee, which amended the wording of the refusal reason 2 and made minor amendments to the sections relating to the principle, future occupiers’ amenity and the conclusion.”

Minutes

Decision and reasons

The application was refused for two reasons, with the second citing inadequate bedroom width, constrained amenity and insufficient communal kitchen space.

“Refused for the reasons 1 and 2 as set out in the report with reason 2 being amended to read:”

“The proposal would not meet with the provisions of the Government's Technical Housing Standards - Nationally Described Space Standards 2015 (NDSS) with regards to Bedroom 4 that would not meet the minimum width requirement for a single bedroom and due to the constraints of the access and location of the ensuite, would provide a limited and constrained internal amenity for prospective occupiers.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Also attending Dan McDonald Labour, Teresa Murray Labour, Louwella Prenter Labour

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Medway Planning Committee minutes, 21 October 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Medway
Date
Wednesday 21 October 2026
Committee decided
Refused
Councillors
13Labour 8Conservative 3Independent 1Reform UK 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

82 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 7 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →