Rear extension and ramp at 48 Palatine Avenue, Lancaster

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee on 28 Sept 2026.

26/00781/FULApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed a single-storey rear extension, room changes, and ramps replacing garden steps to improve accessibility.

“Planning permission is sought for a single storey flat roof rear extension, measuring circa 3.5 metres in height above the external ground level, and projecting 3.9 metres from the rear elevation of the dwelling. The proposed extension is set 1.4 metres away from the adjoining dwelling boundary, and measures 5.45 metres wide.”

“Excavation and levelling work is proposed to replace existing steps within the garden with ramps to navigate the existing change in levels between the shared driveway and the slightly higher private rear garden area serving this dwelling. This is to ensure the garden is more accessible from the proposed extension.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a two-storey semi-detached home with a rear garden, beside open space and a football pitch, and no off-street parking.

“48 Palatine Avenue is a two-storey semi-detached dwelling located in the residential area of Bowerham, immediately south of York Road designated open space and football pitch.”

“The site is largely unconstrainted. The surrounding roads and land are within a smoke control area, and a high-risk urban flood catchment, although the site itself has no identified flood risk. As set out earlier, designated public open space and sports facilities are located to the rear and elevated above the proposed site.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the design suited the area and the development would protect neighbours’ living conditions.

“The rear gardens and rear elevations of this property and those neighbouring are highly visible and prominent from the York Road open space, therefore the design and appearance of the development when viewed from this public open space is a material consideration.”

“The design and appearance of the proposed extension would be consistent with other forms of development within the area. Whilst flat-roofed extensions do not necessarily represent the highest quality of design, the proposal would not appear out of keeping with the character of the surrounding area.”

Officer report

Consultation and representations

County Highways had no objection, and no public representations had been received when the report was prepared.

“At the time of compiling this report, no public representations have been received.”

Officer report

The committee vote

Councillors voted 13 in favour, with none against and no abstentions, and the chair declared the proposal carried.

“It was proposed by Councillor Sue Tyldesley and seconded by Councillor Roger Dennison:”

“Upon being put to the vote, 13 Councillors voted in favour of the proposal with none against and no abstentions, whereupon the Chair declared the proposal to have been carried.”

Minutes

The final decision

The committee approved the application subject to time-limit and approved-plans conditions.

“That the application be approved subject to the following conditions:”

“Time limit. 2. Development in accordance with Approved Plans.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Lancaster Planning Regulatory Committee minutes, 28 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Lancaster's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Lancaster
Date
Monday 28 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
13 for, 0 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

53 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →