Two-storey three-bedroom dwelling at Land Adjacent To 28 Castleton Grove, Chesterfield

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Chesterfield Planning Committee on 15 Jun 2026.

CHE/26/00167/OUTApproved

What was proposed

The application sought outline permission, with all matters reserved, for one dwelling accessed from Castleton Grove.

“This is an application for outline planning permission with all matters reserved for a single dwelling. The site would be accessed from Castleton Grove. Indicative plans have been submitted which seek to demonstrate how the site could be developed. Indicative site plan:”

Officer report

The site

The site is an undeveloped, overgrown parcel at the end of a cul-de-sac, surrounded by residential development and adjoining a footpath.

“The application site is an irregular shaped, undeveloped and overgrown parcel of land located at the end of Castleton Grove, a cul-de-sac. Vegetation is present along the southern boundary of the application site, with a footpath beyond. The site is surrounded by residential development.”

Officer report

Earlier application

An earlier application for a three-bedroom detached bungalow was withdrawn in August 2019.

“CHE/19/00288/FUL - Erection of a three bedroom detached bungalow – withdrawn 20.08.2019”

Officer report

Neighbouring impacts

The indicative layout was considered capable of meeting separation distances and avoiding material loss of light or privacy, while construction-hour controls were recommended.

“The indicative layout plan shows how a property could be sited within the application site, with its side elevation facing towards the side elevation of No 28. This layout would raise no issues with regard to loss of privacy or light to the occupiers of No 28.”

“The indicative layout plan shows a dwelling with its rear elevation facing away from the rear elevations of Nos 22 and 24 and at an oblique angle with the rear elevation of No 26. Having regard to the guidance within the SPD, given the angle of No 26 in relation to the indicative layout provided a minimum distance of 20m would be required between the rear elevations of these properties. The indicative plan demonstrates that this can be achieved.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

consultees raised no objections, although conditions or updates were recommended for coal mining, biodiversity and drainage matters.

“Ward Members No comments received Strategic Planning No objections Coal Authority No objections, subject to two conditions Highway Authority No objections Derbyshire Wildlife Trust No objections, recommends BNG metric is updated and conditions Yorkshire Water No objections, subject to two conditions Borough Council Design Services Drainage No objections Representations One letter received, comments summarised in Section 6 below.”

Officer report

Resident objections

One resident objected over privacy, the dwelling’s design, separation distances, drainage, construction disturbance, neighbour notification, the hedge and footpath.

“The dwelling will overlook my garden and lounge and most importantly my bedroom at the back of my bungalow, the overbearing design and significant loss of privacy. A bungalow would have been a better option for residents.”

“Concerned about the drainage because our foul & 22 & 24 Dovedale goes through that land, will there be any disruptions to the drainage system and do you have drawing of what you propose to do with the drainage system.”

Officer report

Committee discussion

The Principal Planner explained the outline application and reported that no objections had been raised, after which members considered the application.

“The Principal Planner presented the report explaining the application is for Outline planning with all matters reserved. Photos of the site and site plan were shared with Committee. No objections had been raised, and the officer recommendation is to approve subject to conditions.”

“The Committee considered the application, and it was moved by Councillor Callan and seconded by Councillor Stone that the officer recommendation be upheld.”

Minutes

Vote and decision

Members upheld the officer recommendation and granted the application subject to the conditions in the officer’s report.

“That the officer recommendation be upheld, and the application be GRANTED, subject to the conditions outlined in the officer’s report.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Chesterfield Planning Committee minutes, 15 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Chesterfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Monday 15 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

47 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →