Rear extension and terrace at 21 East View, Chingford, London E4

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Waltham Forest Planning Committee on 7 Jul 2026.

260713Approved

What was proposed

Permission was sought to retain a single-storey rear extension, bi-folding doors, and a raised terrace with balustrades and steps.

“The application seeks permission for the retention of a single storey rear extension with bi-folding doors and a raised rear terrace with metal balustrades and access steps.”

Officer report

The site

The site is a two-storey semi-detached home on a bend, with the rear ground level dropping by approximately 920 millimetres.

“The application site comprises of a two-storey semi-detached residential property located on the western side of East View, Chingford. The property is located on a bend in this cul-de-sac. The property is brick built with a brick and pebbledash finish; similar features found on other properties on the street. It is noted that the ground level drops away significantly at the property’s rear by approx. 920mm.”

“The neighbouring property at 19 East View has been extended at its rear by a 3m rear extension positioned across its rear elevation. There is a separation distance of 3-4m between the site of the subject extension and the boundary with this neighbouring property which is located on a lower rear garden ground level.”

Officer report

Earlier permission and changes

An earlier rear-extension scheme was approved, but the completed works were deeper and differed from the approved steps, doors, terrace and balustrades.

“Following this investigation, it was confirmed that the extension had been constructed to project to a depth of 5.8m, a further 800mm further than what was approved. Also, it was confirmed that steps had been located to the rear of the raised platform, rather than within the raised platform itself as in the approved scheme.”

Officer report

Objection and response

One objection raised concerns about scale, boundaries, the 45-degree rule, light, outlook, enclosure, privacy, drainage and construction.

“Objection received Response Concerns over the scale, siting and relationship to the boundary and a failure of the scheme to comply with the 45-degree rule…”

“The side elevation wall facing the neighbouring property at 23 East View is a brick wall with no windows. In addition, even though the raised rear terrace is deeper than in the approved scheme, it is at a lower ground level (480mm) than the raised patio at No. The raised rear terrace would extend 2.6m beyond the raised patio at No. 23 at a height of 300mm above the lower garden ground level of this neighbour.”

Officer report

The committee’s decision

Planning permission was granted in line with the recommendation, conditions, reasons and informatives.

“RESOLVED: That planning permission be GRANTED in line with the recommendations, conditions, reasons and informatives as detailed in the committee report for application 260713 for retention of a single storey rear extension with bi-folding doors and a raised rear terrace with metal balustrades and access steps.”

Minutes

Permission conditions

The development must be maintained in accordance with the approved plans and documents for its lifetime.

“The Planning Committee is requested to resolve that planning permission be granted subject to the following conditions.”

“The development hereby permitted shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans and documents listed below for the lifetime of the development:”

Officer report

Sources

  • Waltham Forest Planning Committee minutes, 7 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Waltham Forest's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 7 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

26 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →