Moorings, The Boaters Inn, Canbury Gardens, Kingston KT2 5AU Data via plota.co.uk

PA26/0051 - Consultation Other Decided
Signs & adverts

Proposal

Installation of 1 non-illuminated projecting sign. Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.
View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
29 Dec 2025
Decision
Target date was 19 Jan 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision around 9 Nov 2026; it is now day 315.

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Licences at this address

  • Licence Boaters Inn Premises licence · in force Hours not given on the register
  • Licence Canbury Gardens Premises licence · in force Hours not given on the register

Licensed hours are what the licence permits, not opening times.

Site constraints 10

SSSI: Bushy Park and Home Park SSSI
Natural England must be consulted on work that may affect it.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Metropolitan Open Land
Green belt level protection inside London.
The London Plan gives Metropolitan Open Land the same protection as green belt: inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Registered park or garden: Hampton Court
Nationally designated heritage. Its significance and setting carry great weight.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
Hampton Court Park conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. A site survey can differ.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Habitat network: Wood pasture and parkland
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Public transport access: PTAL 0 (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square.
Not affected
Not green belt · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 3 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

6 Nov 2026

61 - 65 Holborn Viaduct London EC1A 2FD

City of London ref 26/01538/FULL - Application under Section 73, in relation to...

PA26/3797
3 Nov 2026Pending

The Old Kings Head, Hampton Court Road, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4AE

Change the use class of the front part of the ground floor (except the rear flat...

PA26/1108
26 Oct 2026Approved

29 to 31 High Street and Land To rear of High Street, Hampton Wick, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 4DA

Demolition of Nos. 29 and 29b High Street and associated outbuildings, and erect

PA26/3661
14 Oct 2026

Holmwood Kingston Hill Kingston Upon Thames

Change of use from dwellinghouse (Use C3) to use as health and wellness retreat ...

PA26/3514
6 Oct 2026

Jolly Boatman And Hampton Court Station Redevelopment Area Hampton Court Way East Molesey Surrey KT8 9AE

Consultation from Elmbridge Council - Ref. 2026/2098. Variation of condition 2

PA26/3402
30 Sept 2026

UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER BOATHOUSE HARTINGTON ROAD CHISWICK W4 3UJ

Temporary sports changing and toilet facilities for up to three years. Consul

PA26/3345

Important details

Council
Richmond upon Thames
Application type
Consultation Other
Postcode
KT2 5AU
Received
29 Dec 2025
Validated
29 Dec 2025
Ward
Out of Borough
Case officer
Show
Target decision
19 Jan 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

Decision outlook

Day 315, past the statutory target. 100% of signs and adverts in Richmond upon Thames are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 3 Nov 2026.

Day 315259 days past the 56-day target
78%decided within 8 weeks
78%approved
98decided in the last year

Plota live figures for signs and adverts decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings