Brooms Down 35 Mill Lane Wateringbury Maidstone Kent ME18 5PE Data via plota.co.uk

26/01456/FL - Planning Permission Withdrawn

Proposal

Replacement windows and doors Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
3 Aug 2026
Validated
25 Aug 2026
Consultation
26 Aug 2026
Withdrawn
27 Aug 2026

Withdrawn on 27 Aug 2026 · Last checked 3 Sept 2026

Documents 56

Plans & drawings 54

PDF SITE LOCATION PLAN Site Location Plan · 25 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 11 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 03 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING AND PROPOSED LEFT ELEVATION Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 37 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 35 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 21 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF INVALID LOCATION PLAN Drawing Superseded · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING AND PROPOSED RIGHT ELEVATION Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 20 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 26 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING AND PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 07 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 05 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 06 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 27 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 09 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 01 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 14 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 23 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 38 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 46 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 32 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 42 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 45 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF EXISTING AND PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 02 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 40 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 10 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 47 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 28 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 18 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 15 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 13 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 34 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 19 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 24 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 39 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 43 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 08 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 17 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 36 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 12 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 16 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 22 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 33 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 04 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 25 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 29 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 30 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 31 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 41 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF SHEET 44 OF 47 Drawing · 3 Aug 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 8

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Wateringbury conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI 175 m away: Wateringbury SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
Public restricted byway 29 m away; 2 listed buildings within 150 m; Inside the Wateringbury built-up area; the 1970s provisional farmland map had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Tonbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Tonbridge
Application type
Planning Permission
Postcode
ME18 5PE
Received
3 Aug 2026
Validated
25 Aug 2026
Ward
East & West Peckham Mereworth And Wbury
Parish
Wateringbury
Target decision
20 Oct 2026
Decision
Application Withdrawn
Decision date
27 Aug 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
Elwira Baranowicz

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 3 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PLP-00005923
Consultation
26 Aug 2026
Comments by
16 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Tonbridge
Planning Authority Score
4/10
Below average
#193 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Tonbridge is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #244 out of 296. 54% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (97%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Tonbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
95%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #31 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #45 of 296
49%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #244 of 296
54%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #246 of 296
88%
Minor dwellings approved
96 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
89%
Change of use approved
9 decided
880
Total decisions
47 refused in the year to March 2026