Relocated southern access at Laurel Rise and Grey Stables (former Plot 1), Eastergate
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Arun Planning Committee on 26 Aug 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought to vary approved plans, access arrangements and visibility splays, including moving the southern access further south.
“DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATIONVariation of conditions 1, 2 and 9 of AL/112/24/S73 which required access arrangements to be carried out in accordance with the approved drawings and the submission of visibility splays. TOPOGRAPHYPredominantly flat. TREESNone of affected by the development. SITE CHARACTERISTICSTwo semi-detached, two storey dwellings (Laurel Rise and Grey Gables) with rear gardens and front parking areas.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
Earlier permissions approved two semi-detached houses, changes to the site plan, fenestration and landscaping, and a revised access proposal.
“AL/121/16/PL2No. semi detached houses. This application is a Departure from the development plan ApproveConditionally 01-02-17”
“AL/21/21/NMANon material amendment following grant of AL/116/18/PL for changes to fenestration from the approved plans and changes to the Landscaping plan previously approved Part Apprv/Part Refu 04-03-21 AL/44/26/S73”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the access changes were considered safe, visually acceptable and consistent with relevant development plan policies.
“The policies of the Arun Local Plan (ALP) and the Aldingbourne Neighbourhood Development Plan (ANDP) remain in force now as at the time of the original decision and it is not necessary to reconsider the whole application afresh. Due to the nature of the changes, it is only relevant to assess the proposal in respect of highway safety and the character/appearance of the immediate surroundings.”
“HIGHWAY SAFETY: ALP policy T SP1 seeks to ensure development provides safe access on to the highway network. Schemes should accommodate the efficient delivery of goods and supplies; give priority to pedestrian and cycle movements and create safe and secure layouts for traffic/cyclists/pedestrians. The Arun Design Guide (ADG) contains guidance relevant to highway layout. ANDP policy GA2 states the loss of footpaths and cycle paths will be resisted.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
No parish council or nearby occupier representations were received, while highways requested further visibility information and was reconsulted.
“REPRESENTATIONS Aldingbourne Parish Council - no comment received.”
“No representations received from nearby occupiers COMMENTS ON REPRESENTATIONS RECEIVED: Noted. CONSULTATIONS CONSULTATION RESPONSES RECEIVED: WSCC Highways - More Information requested. Vehicular visibility splays of 2.4m x 43m in accordance with 30mph speed limit have been demonstrated from the amended access location. In previous applications visibility splays of 59m had been provided and the Highways Statements state that splays in excess of 43m can be achieved.”
Officer report
Who spoke
One supporter addressed the committee.
Members’ discussion
Members discussed why the access relocation had not been identified earlier and clarified the location of the footpath.
“During the debate, Councillor Lury expressed surprise that the need to relocate the access had not been identified at an earlier stage, given the presence of existing utilities. However, he acknowledged that the revised arrangement appeared to represent an improvement and indicated his support for the application.”
“Councillor Wallsgrove sought clarification regarding reference to a footpath, noting that there was no footpath on the side of the road where the access was proposed and that the footpath was located on the opposite side.”
Minutes
The vote
The officer recommendation for conditional approval was unanimously supported.
“As there were no further questions or comments, the Chair put the officer recommendation to the vote. Upon being put to the vote, the recommendation to grant planning permission, subject to conditions, was unanimously supported.”
Minutes
The decision
The committee approved the application conditionally.
“That the application be APPROVED CONDITIONALLY.”
Minutes
Sources
- Arun Planning Committee minutes, 26 August 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Arun's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Arun Planning Committee
- Council
- Arun
- Date
- Wednesday 26 August 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Public speakers
- The supporter
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Arun committee decisions →
This committee's year
51 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.