The Heights Primary School, 82 Gosbrook Road, Caversham, Reading Data via plota.co.uk

PL/26/0063 - Consent under Tree Preservation Orders Approved

Proposal

Please see attached Tree report for Ash trees 82 Gosbrook Road for detail. Please note that Tree ID 0GWE and 0GEF is likely to have been considered as one multiple Ash tree and ID GWK is other Ash in TPO 7/08. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
26 Mar 2026

Approved on 26 Mar 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 23 Aug 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Reading Planning Applications Committee on 4 Mar 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • The application proposed felling three trees because they presented a risk and no feasible alternatives were available.
  • No objections or comments were received following public notice.
  • The committee approved the works and required consultation on the replacement oak tree’s location.

Source: Plota analysis of Reading's committee minutes, Reading Planning Applications Committee minutes, 4 March 2026 .

Site constraints 4

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Air quality management area: Reading AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 3; Inside the Caversham built-up area.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Reading - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Reading
Application type
Consent under Tree Preservation Orders
Received
21 Jan 2026
Validated
21 Jan 2026
Ward
Caversham Ward
Target decision
18 Mar 2026
Decision
Approve
Decision date
26 Mar 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 64 days from validation, 28 days slower than Reading's median of 36 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

91%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
200decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Reading in the last twelve months, from validation. Reading decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 23 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Reading
Planning Authority Score
2.4/10
Poor
#258 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Reading is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #274 out of 296. 52% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Reading decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
84%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #226 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #163 of 296
37%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #274 of 296
52%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #236 of 296
67%
Minor dwellings approved
67 decided (1-9 homes)
67%
Major dwellings approved
6 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
44 decided
643
Total decisions
103 refused in the year to March 2026