Gamston Medical Centre Ambleside Gamston Nottinghamshire NG2 6PS Data via plota.co.uk

26/00956/DISCON - Discharge of Condition(s) Decided

Proposal

Discharge conditions 7 (Noise levels for mounted plant/equipment) and 12 (cycle parking) from planning permission Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
3 Jun 2026
Consultation
4 Jun 2026
Conditions Discharged
29 Jul 2026

Conditions Discharged on 29 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 30 Jul 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 7, 10, 12 decided (outcome not recorded)

Site constraints 2

Also on the record
Inside the West Bridgford built-up area; the 1970s provisional farmland map had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Postcode
NG2 6PS
Received
3 Jun 2026
Validated
3 Jun 2026
Ward
Gamston
Case officer
Show
Target decision
29 Jul 2026
Decision
Conditions Discharged
Decision date
29 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Chris Tweed

Public comments

No public comments yet.

Last counted 30 Jul 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
4 Jun 2026
Comments by
25 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026