Protected tree works at Street Record, Friendly Close, Margate

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Thanet Planning Committee on 15 Jul 2026.

TPO/TH/26/0573Approved

What was proposed

Works to four protected trees include removing growth or branches, crown reductions, deadwood removal and lifting one crown over a footpath.

“LOCATION: M/TPO/3(1952) - 1 No. Sycamore (T1213) Remove epicormic growth up to 6m above ground level. 1 No. Norway Maple (T1212) Remove hanger. Remove lowest branch back to the stem. 1 No. Sycamore (T1210) - 1-2m Crown reduction, pruning to suitable secondary branches, focusing reduction on extended branches roadside. Crown clean, removing deadwood Greater than 25mm diameter and dying diseased growth, 2.5m crown Lift over footpath. 1 No.”

Officer report

The site

The trees stand in a grassland group beside three roads and provide a highly visible feature with high public amenity value overall.

“The trees are located within a group on a small piece of grassland bounded by Northdown Park Road to the South, Queen Elizabeth Road to the West and Friendly Close to the East. The group of mixed species of varying ages provide a highly visible feature in the street scene, though some individual trees within the group would be low in amenity value the group as a whole have high public amenity value.”

Officer report

Earlier tree works

There is no history of works to these trees.

“There is no history of works to these trees.”

Officer report

The officer recommendation

Officers recommended approval because the works were considered an appropriate balance between health and safety, tree management and area amenity.

“Trees are important to the character and quality of an area, providing a visual break and relief from built development. They can lend character, in particular to conservation areas, and provide many other benefits, including the provision of natural habitats, the enhancement of health and wellbeing and the improvement of air quality. As such the retention of trees where possible are always sought.”

“The proposed works are considered to meet an appropriate balance between health and safety, management of the trees and the amenity of the area. It is therefore recommended that Members approve the application.”

Officer report

Consultation and representations

A site notice was posted, but no letters or representations were received and there were no consultations.

“A site notice was posted close to the site. No letters or representations have been received.”

Officer report

The vote

Councillors agreed the motion to approve, with nine votes for, no votes against and no abstentions.

“Councillor Rattigan proposed and Councillor Makinson seconded that the officer recommendation to APPROVE be AGREED.”

“When put to the vote the motion was AGREED.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Mike Garner Green, George Rusiecki Conservative

Also attending Ruth Duckworth Labour

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Thanet Planning Committee minutes, 15 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Thanet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Thanet
Date
Wednesday 15 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
11Labour 7Conservative 2Green 1Reform UK 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

86 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →