400-home community at Land Coordinates Dunsfold Road Alfold Cranleigh Outline application with all matters reserved except for access for a

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Waverley Planning Committee on 13 May 2026.

WA/2025/00219Refused

What was proposed

The outline scheme sought up to 400 private and affordable homes, a community facility, infrastructure, open space, play areas, drainage and landscaping.

“WA/2025/00219 – Outline Application With All Matters Reserved Except For Access For A Development Of Up To 400 Dwellings To Provide Private And Affordable Homes With A Community Commercial Facility; Associated Infrastructure Works Including Vehicle Cycle And Pedestrian Access Allotments Areas Of Open Space And Play Provision; Sustainable Drainage And Landscaping.”

“The proposed development comprises: a residential development up to 400 new homes of which 120 units would be affordable units (30%); with a community commercial facility; associated infrastructure works (including vehicle, cycle and pedestrian access); allotments; areas of open space and play provision; sustainable drainage and landscaping. This application is accompanied by an Environmental Statement (ES), which has been assessed by Entran on behalf of the Council.”

Officer report

The site

The site comprised five agricultural fields beside Alfold Crossways, west of Loxwood Road and adjoining woodland, farmland, housing and recreation land.

“The application site, located at the western edge of Alford Crossways which forms part of a wider agricultural estate. It is positioned west of Loxwood Road (adjacent to Alfold Recreation Ground), and south of those residential properties fronting Dunsfold Road. A new residential development “Loxwood Fields’ (currently being built by the Appellant) adjoins the site to the south (see Planning History WA/2020/1684).”

“The site itself comprises five agricultural fields (totalling 22.9 hectares), with associated linear drainage ditches. Existing site levels are predominantly flat. Levels range from…”

Officer report

Consultees’ views

Some consultees raised no objection subject to conditions or contributions, while Surrey Wildlife Trust retained concerns about protected species, habitats and biodiversity mitigation.

“Natural England Request for further information addressed. No objection subject to conditions…”

“Repeated strong objection on the basis of a major and disproportionate urban extension at an unsustainable location being within the open countryside and outside of the settlement boundary. Additional concerns on the basis of infrastructure contrary to the Neighbourhood Plan; effectiveness of the proposed mitigation measures.”

Officer report

Residents’ objections

Of 285 letters received, all but one objected, mainly citing infrastructure, traffic, overdevelopment, environmental damage, community effects and construction disruption.

“In accordance with the statutory requirements and the “Reaching Out to the Community – Local Development Framework – Statement of Community Involvement – ” the application was advertised in the newspaper on 14.02.2025 and the updated description was advertised on 07.11.2025 (expiring 08.12.2025). Site notices were displayed around the site on 14.02.25 and 07.11.2025, and neighbour notification letters were sent on 05.02.2025 and 04.11.2025.”

“204 comments raised infrastructure concerns (water, sewage, electricity, GP, schools, drainage) • 176 comments raised traffic & highway impact concerns (volume, congestion, safety, A281, Crossways junction) • 158 comments raised overdevelopment & character harm concerns (scale, density, outside of settlement, cumulative growth, loss of rural character) • 112 comments raised environmental & wildlife harm concerns (ecosystems, animals, ancient woodland, light/noise…”

Officer report

Committee debate

The minutes record that the committee debated the application before voting on the officers’ recommendation.

“Outline Application With All Matters Reserved Except For Access For A Development Of Up To 400 Dwellings To Provide Private And Affordable Homes With A Community Commercial Facility; Associated Infrastructure Works Including Vehicle Cycle And Pedestrian Access Allotments Areas Of Open Space And Play Provision; Sustainable Drainage And Landscaping.”

“Following debate, the Committee voted unanimously in favour of the officers recommendation to refuse permission 13 in favour.”

Minutes

The decision

The committee resolved that, had the Council determined the application, planning permission would have been refused.

“Had the Council determined the application planning permission be REFUSED.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Waverley Planning Committee minutes, 13 May 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Waverley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Waverley
Date
Wednesday 13 May 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended refusal
Committee decided
Refused
Vote
Unanimous
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

45 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →