Adel Kennels Eccup Lane Eccup Leeds LS16 8AL Data via plota.co.uk

26/02873/COND - Discharge of Conditions Decided

Proposal

Consent, agreement or approval required by conditions 4 (Materials), 6 (EV Charging Points), 7 (Landscape), 8 (Trees, Hedges, Bushes), 9 (Landscape Management), 11 (Retention of Orchard and Meadow Area), 13 (Importing Soil) and 14 (FRM) of Planning Application Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 May 2026
✓
Consultation
22 May 2026
✓
Split decision
25 Jun 2026

Split decision on 25 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Associated applications 3

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14 decided (outcome not recorded)

Site constraints 5

Green belt: South and West Yorkshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat about 11 m away: Deciduous woodland; National infrastructure project about 1065 m away: Calderdale Energy Park, at pre-application.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £345,000 in September 2021. Other property, freehold.

28 September 2021£345,000Recorded as a transfer outside a standard sale

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Leeds - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Leeds
Application type
Discharge of Conditions
Postcode
LS16 8AL
Received
20 May 2026
Validated
20 May 2026
Ward
Alwoodley
Parish
Alwoodley Parish Council
Target decision
15 Jul 2026
Decision
Split decision
Decision date
25 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Gagarin Studio

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
22 May 2026
Comments by
12 Jun 2026
Statutory expiry
15 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Leeds
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#131 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Leeds is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #95 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (85%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Leeds decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
83%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #238 of 296
85%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #249 of 296
73%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #95 of 296
33%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #78 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
208 decided (1-9 homes)
86%
Major dwellings approved
36 decided (10+ homes)
68%
Change of use approved
279 decided
3,681
Total decisions
613 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.