House extensions and loft conversion at 7 Alben Road, Binfield, Bracknell

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Bracknell Forest Planning Committee on 16 Jul 2026.

PA/2026/0438Approved

What was proposed

The application sought a front side extension, a first-floor rear side infill extension and a loft conversion with a dormer.

“This application seeks planning permission for a proposed front side extension, first floor rear side infill extension and loft conversion with dormer.”

“Full planning permission is sought for the erection of a front side extension, first floor rear side infill extension and loft conversion with dormer.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site is a three-bedroom semi-detached home within the settlement boundary, on a private unmade road, and has been extended before.

“The application site is a 3 bedroom, semi-detached dwelling within the settlement boundary of Binfield and within the Binfield and Popeswood Character Area as defined by the Character Area Assessments SPD. The property has been extended in the past.”

“Alben Road is a private, unadopted and unmade road accessed from Terrace Road South to the west.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

Two earlier rear-extension applications were approved in 1998 and 1999.

“623565 | Approved | 03.11.98 Erection of part two storey part single storey rear extension.”

“624869 | Approved | 06.01.1999 Erection of single storey rear extension. Part PD removed…”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers considered the development acceptable in principle and found no adverse effect on neighbours, the area’s character, the home or highway safety.

“The proposed development is considered to be acceptable in principle and would not have an adverse impact on the amenity of neighbouring dwellings, the character and appearance of the surrounding area or the host dwelling, nor is it considered to have an adverse impact on highway safety.”

Officer report

Highway safety concern

The Highway Authority objected because one parking space would be lost, potentially causing unsafe on-street parking and obstruction.

“The Highway Authority was consulted and objected to the proposal stating:”

“The proposal results in the loss of an existing parking space. Alben Road is a narrow, private road with limited opportunity for safe on-street parking and the impact of the loss of parking on-site would result in an unacceptable impact on highway safety (including for pedestrians).”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The parish council raised no objection, and no other representations were received.

“Binfield Parish Council raised no objection.”

“No other representations have been received.”

Officer report

Officers’ highway assessment

Officers acknowledged the highway objection but considered that vehicles could park without an unacceptable or cumulative highway-safety impact.

“Paragraph 116 of the NPPF states that development should only be prevented or refused on highway grounds if there would be an unacceptable impact on highway safety, or the residual cumulative impacts on the road network, following mitigation, would be severe, taking into account all reasonable future scenarios.”

“Whilst the case officer acknowledges the Highway Authority’s objection, when considering paragraph 116 of the NPPF, it is not considered that additional on-street parking would have an unacceptable or cumulative impact on highway safety or wider road network.”

Officer report

Committee discussion

The minutes record that the Highway Authority responded to questions at the meeting, without setting out the questions or answers.

“Binfield Parish Council had no objections to the application and there were no further representations. • A consultee response from the Highways Authority who also responded to questions at the meeting. • An amendment to condition 2 as detailed in the supplementary report and noted in the resolution below.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee approved the application subject to conditions, including an amended condition identifying the approved plans.

“RESOLVED that the application be APPROVED subject to the following conditions:”

“The development hereby permitted shall be carried out only in accordance with the following approved plans and other submitted details: Amended Proposed Plans – A101 – Rev 01 – Received 08.07.2026 Amended Block Plan and Location Map – A103 – Rev 02– Received 15.07.2026 REASON: To ensure that the development is carried out only as approved by the Local Planning Authority.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Bracknell Forest Planning Committee minutes, 16 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Bracknell Forest's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Thursday 16 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

25 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →